Appraisal Time Adjustments Are Underused

Appraisers ignoring time adjustments for local house price growth are affecting valuations

Appraisal Time Adjustments Are Underused
Senior Economist

National Trends In Time Adjustment

During the analysis period, from the third quarter of 2018 through the fourth quarter of 2021, house prices generally rose, especially in 2021. National house prices grew annually from 5 to 18% over this period. For residential real estate, recent sales of comparable properties are commonly used to determine a property’s valuation. Because comparable sales in this analysis are typically six months old at the time of the appraisal, expected time adjustments would range from approximately 2.5% to 9% of the sales price, on average. 

However, time adjustments are not very common. During much of the analysis period, appraisers time adjusted fewer than 10% of comparable sales. Even during the rapid price increases of 2021, time adjustment frequency rose only to about 25%. While adjustments are not necessarily expected in every case, these rates seem to be considerably lower than local price growth would warrant, as discussed in the next section.

Do Appraisers Ma​ke Time Adjustments When Necessary?

​When comparable sales are recent, or house price growth is slow or flat, there may be no need for a time adjustment. Thus, to determine whether time adjustments are underutilized, it is insufficient to note that adjustment rates are well below 100%. We need a benchmark that estimates how large the adjustment for each comparable should be. Here, monthly house price indexes for ZIP codes are used to walk forward the comparable sales amounts. For each comparable in the data, the price indexes are used to calculate a predicted time adjustment corresponding to the age of the comparable and local price trends.

For 20% of comparables, the predicted adjustment was less than 1 percentage point in absolute value. For another 16% of comparables, the predicted adjustment was between 1 and 2 percentage points. Appraisers time adjusted only about 5% of these properties, perhaps because these adjustments are too small to have much impact. However, making no time adjustment amounts to an assumed adjustment of zero, which is unlikely to be accurate. 

In addition, a leading appraisal textbook discusses several examples featuring time adjustments close to 1% or even less.3 

Thus, it appears that adjustments were unnecessary for, at most, the 36% of properties where the predicted adjustment was between -1 and 2%. This result implies that appraisers should have time-adjusted 64% of comparables, far greater than the 13% they actually adjusted.​ Appraisers time adjust most of the time only when the predicted adjustment is 20% or larger.

 

A​re Time Adjustments Accurate?

For predicted adjustments from 1 to 3%, actual time adjustments are within a few tenths of a percentage point. However, as the expected adjustment gets larger, the discrepancy grows. When the predicted adjustment is 5%, actual adjustments average 3%. At 10%, actual adjustments average 5%.​

This blog documents that appraisers underutilize and underestimate time adjustments but does not attempt to determine the cause or propose potential solutions. One potential reason for underutilization is that these adjustments are some of the more analytically complex calculations appraisers might perform. Also, market information about comparable sales data can be sparse, decentralized, and observed with a lag. The data may also be costly (or at least not always free) and is not always available publicly (which may require paying for access to private databases).

This article was originally published in the Mortgage Banker Magazine March 2024 issue.
About the author
Senior Economist
Scott Susin is a senior economist for the FHFA Office of Fair Lending Oversight Division of Housing Mission and Goals. A complete version of this article originally appeared in the FHFA’s Insight Blog.
Published on
Feb 26, 2024
Mortgage Banker Magazine
Secondary Strategies: Buydowns vs. Float Downs

Higher rates for longer complicate rate-reduction strategies

Preetam Purohit
Mortgage Banker Magazine
Automation Attracts Investors Who Love Homogenous Loan Pools

Human-free underwriting promises to expand primary and secondary, non-agency markets

Ryan Kingsley
Mortgage Banker Magazine
Raising An Ai Brainchild In The Mortgage Industry

Angel Ai takes on the next five years with a new ‘do and functions to boot

Sarah Wolak
Mortgage Banker Magazine
Building A Digital Bridge Between Separate Revenue Streams

Menu cloud-based technology capitalizes on the entire borrowing cycle

David Aach
Mortgage Banker Magazine
Yield Curve, Schmield Curve?

The yield curve is a harbinger, not the be-all, end-all for lenders.

Rob Chrisman
Mortgage Banker Magazine
Credit’s Cookin’

Menu of borrowers to grow with new scoring system

Erica Drzewiecki

Webinars

OriginatorTech Deep Dive: CreditXpert

What is OriginatorTech Deep Dive? This is a collaborative demo where you and other mortgage professionals w...

Webinar
Apr 23, 2024
Investor Confidence in Today’s Non-QM And Why Originators Are Paying Attention... A Virtual Town Hall

We host Angel Oak Mortgage Solutions for a special 2021 edition of their virtual town hall series they ran fro...

Webinar
Apr 08, 2021
How to Help Real Estate Pros in a Post-Refi World

Hear from Melissa Merriman, REALTOR® with The Melissa Merriman Team at Keller Williams, on what real estate pr...

Webinar
Mar 18, 2021
Connect with your local mortgage community.

Meet your your colleagues, both national and local, by attending an event in your area.