Skip to main content

New sub-prime research highlights need for enterprise risk management

Sep 29, 2009

Focusing on implications from the sub-prime mortgage crisis and approaches to address future crises, actuaries in the U.S. have expressed the need for enterprise-wide risk management approaches through business practices and regulatory enhancements. The Society of Actuaries (SOA) and the Joint Risk Management Section have sponsored a new paper, “The Financial Crisis and Lessons for Insurers,” providing further insights on the causes of the subprime crisis, and subsequently the financial crisis. Taking the findings into consideration, the American Academy of Actuaries has also put forth recommendations for regulatory improvements to help guard against future crises. “The burst of the housing bubble and subsequent global financial crisis exposed many structural issues in the broader financial system and weakness in firms’ risk management approaches; they must be addressed to avoid another major crisis” said Dr. Shaun Wang, MAAA, FCAS, report author and Thomas P. Bowles Chair Professor of Actuarial Science at Georgia State University. “To move forward, it is essential to develop intelligence about the big-picture environment and address accordingly the near and long-term challenges facing the insurance industry. This applies not only for insurers, but for businesses in general.” While the paper focuses on the sub-prime mortgage crisis as the catalyst to the U.S. and global financial downturn, the authors address a variety of topics in relation to the insurance industry. The paper identifies, among other items: ► The root causes of the sub-prime mortgage crisis, one primary cause being the belief that housing prices could not decline significantly on a national basis ► What factors, such as aggressive investing, led to insurers’ exposure in these markets ► Risk metrics to measure insurers’ exposure ► What may have contributed to insurers’ exposure, such as ineffective regulation ► Potential issues that insurers will be faced with the current downturn, (e.g., exposures to commercial real estate ► What types of enterprise risk management (ERM) strategies may have been used and can be used moving forward to avoid similar outcomes (see below) ► The overall lessons for insurers, such as the importance of liquidity management The ERM strategies that financial firms and insurers should focus on for an enterprise-wide approach to risk management are: 1. A strong risk management culture must start at the top. 2. Risk management is most effective when used to prevent crisis rather than manage them. 3. The financial system is interconnected, so businesses need to look at what others are doing in the industry, not just their own risks and processes. 4. Establish a robust liquidity management system. 5. Develop a counterparty risk management system and limits. 6. Keep watch on high profit areas, as these are the areas where the greatest risks emanate. 7. Refine tools to systematically aggregate exposures. 8. Understand the limitations of models and the related assumptions. 9. Incorporate a wide variety of economic scenarios for stress tests.   Companies can use these guidelines in helping apply an enterprise-wide approach to risk management. Inside or outside the insurance industry, it is essential to look at ways not only to mitigate risk, but also maximize opportunities for businesses in today’s difficult economic climate. In examining the mortgage and financial crises, the paper also addresses the related issues of liquidity and diversification, and their roles in the downturn. Diversification, for example, was widely thought to be a solely risk mitigation and profit building strategy. The paper advises the C-suite to understand that diversification brings with it its own risks that need to be considered in an evaluation as well. In conjunction with the release of this research, the American Academy of Actuaries has provided recommendations for regulatory improvements. Specifically, the regulatory recommendations include: ►Developing a systemic risk regulatory structure for the financial services sector ►Determining appropriate constraints and capital requirements on investments ►Establishing new regulatory transparency requirements for rating agencies and third party advisors The research conducted to complete the paper, and the regulatory recommendations developed as a result, are part of actuaries’ ongoing efforts to help businesses navigate past the financial crisis and prepare for emerging challenges on the horizon. For a copy of the paper, “The Financial Crisis and Lessons for Insurers,” please visit www.soa.org.  
About the author
Published
Sep 29, 2009
Mortgage Servicers Added To Junk-Fee Naughty List

New release from CFPB lays out areas of improvement, and concern, for mortgage servicers.

In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."