Skip to main content

GSE CEOs Want More Money

May 05, 2015
Stacks of money

The chief executive officers of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are not satisfied with their respective pre-bonus salaries of $600,000 each, and have requested that the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) review their compensation.

According to a Wall Street Journal report, Freddie Mac’s Donald Layton and Fannie Mae’s Timothy J. Mayopoulos are asking FHFA Director Mel Watt to revisit the 2012 compensation limits imposed on the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that were imposed by then-Acting Director Edward DeMarco. The executive pay program initially limited the chief executives’ salaries at $500,000 and prohibited bonuses, but this was later changed to a $600,000 ceiling and the inclusion of bonuses. Prior to these limits, former Fannie Mae President and CEO Michael J. Williams’ 2010 compensation was $900,000 in base pay and $2.37 million in bonuses and Freddie Mac CEO Charles E. Haldeman Jr. took home $6 million in combined base pay and bonuses–while DeMarco only had an annual salary of $239,555.

In the request from Layton, the attempt to increase the CEO salary was based on “objectives of providing for CEO retention; effective succession planning for the CEO position; and continuity.” However, the request might be awkwardly timed–a recent FHFA stress test that found the GSEs would need up to $157.3 billion in federal aid in the event of another dramatic economic decline.

Also complicating matters is Freddie Mac’s first quarter earnings report, which was released this morning: The GSE generated a quarterly net income of $524 million, which is up from the fourth quarter of 2014’s $227 million but down dramatically from the $4 billion in the first quarter of 2014. Freddie Mac said it would send the U.S. Treasury $746 million in June, the smallest dividend payment back to the government since 2009. 

UPDATE: A spokesperson for Fannie Mae sent National Mortgage Professional Magazine the following message: OK, so it wasn’t a request from the CEOs. FHFA communicated to Freddie and Fannie that the Boards of Directors could submit a proposal to FHFA regarding compensation. The communication can be found on page 70 of Freddie Mac’s 10-Q that they released today at www.freddiemac.com/investors/er/pdf/10q_1q15.pdf.

About the author
Published
May 05, 2015
In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."

Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Banning NTRAPS

The new law prohibits the recording of NTRAPS in property records, creates penalties if NTRAPS are recorded, and provides for the removal of NTRAPS currently in place.