Skip to main content

Sen. Bernie Sanders Tries Again to Dismantle Largest Banks

May 06, 2015

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), citing a need to “safeguard the economy and prevent another costly taxpayer bailout,” has re-introduced legislation to break up the nation’s largest banks. A similar bill was simultaneously introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA).

The proposed legislation, dubbed, the "Too Big to Fail, Too Big to Exist Act," would require federal regulators identify commercial banks, investment banks, hedge funds, insurance companies and other institutions whose “failure would have a catastrophic effect on the stability of either the financial system or the United States economy without substantial government assistance.” The U.S. Department of the Treasury would be required to break up institutions deemed too-big-to-fail, and these institutions would be barred from receiving a Federal Reserve bailout and from using customers’ bank deposits to speculate on derivatives and other investment activities that are considered to be high risk.

Sen. Sanders and Rep. Sherman stated that the targeted institutions must include eight institutions identified as “systemically important banks” by the Financial Stability Board–Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, State Street and Wells Fargo.

“No single financial institution should have holdings so extensive that its failure could send the world economy into crisis,” Sen. Sanders said. “If an institution is too big to fail, it is too big to exist.”

“Never again should a financial institution be able to demand a federal bailout,” Rep. Sherman said. “They claim, ‘If we go down, the economy is going down with us,’ but by breaking up these institutions long before they face a crisis, we ensure a healthy financial system where medium-sized institutions can compete in the free market.”

Sen. Sanders and Rep. Sherman unsuccessfully advocated similar legislation in the last Congress, and their efforts to have provision ensuring this solution included within the Dodd-Frank Act failed. But this year’s announcement achieved more prominence because Sen. Sanders recently announced that he would pursue the Democratic Party nomination for president. His call to target the nation’s biggest banks puts him at odds with Hillary Clinton, whose relationship with the major Wall Street institutions has generated criticism from progressive elements of the Democratic Party. Another potential Democratic presidential candidate, former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, has also supported the effort to dismantle the too-big-to-fail banks.

The proposed legislation was greeted with support by Camden R. Fine, president and chief executive officer of the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), the trade organization representing the nation’s smaller banks.

“ICBA agrees that the too-big-to-fail megabanks are too big to exist,” said Fine in a statement. “After triggering a historic financial crisis and receiving trillions of dollars in taxpayer assistance, the nation’s largest and riskiest financial institutions continue to pose systemic threats to our economy while enjoying an artificial funding advantage subsidized by taxpayers. The Sanders-Sherman legislation would require policymakers to identify and downsize firms whose failure would pose a catastrophic threat to the financial system or U.S. economy without substantial taxpayer assistance. ICBA looks forward to continuing to work with Congress and the regulators on all viable solutions that will end our nation's too-big-to-fail problem.”

About the author
Published
May 06, 2015
In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."

Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Banning NTRAPS

The new law prohibits the recording of NTRAPS in property records, creates penalties if NTRAPS are recorded, and provides for the removal of NTRAPS currently in place.