Skip to main content

Congressman Seeks to Take $104M From HUD on Public Housing Scandal

Oct 13, 2015
Take Money

Rep. David Jolly (R-FL), a member of the House Appropriations Committee, has threatened to remove $104 million from the budget of the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) regarding the presence of “over-income” tenants in HUD-backed public housing.

“Three of the five housing authorities I’ve spoken with said they would like to evict these tenants, but they are prohibited from doing so,” Jolly said in an interview with the Washington Post. “HUD is saying they can. I don’t know who is right.”

Jolly came to the $104 million figure because that is the sum spent annually to subsidize over-income tenants in a sample of 15 local housing authorities, according to a recent report from the department’s inspector general.

“There is $104 million of taxpayer money that is being wasted on tenants who shouldn’t be in public housing,” Jolly continued. “If HUD doesn’t fix the problem, I’m going to take $104 million out of the agency’s budget.”

The report generated criticism with some of its excessive findings, including the identification of a family of four in New York City with a $497,911 salary that pays $1,574 in rent for a three-bedroom apartment in public housing.

HUD claimed that it lacks the authority to evict over-income tenants, stating that was the responsibility of local housing authorities. Jolly, a two-term congressman who has announced that he will seek the U.S. Senate seat vacated by Marco Rubio, dismissed HUD’s reaction as a case of “classic Washington” responsibility dodging.

About the author
Published
Oct 13, 2015
In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."

Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Banning NTRAPS

The new law prohibits the recording of NTRAPS in property records, creates penalties if NTRAPS are recorded, and provides for the removal of NTRAPS currently in place.