Skip to main content

DOJ Lawsuit Against Quicken Loans Headed to Detroit

Nov 16, 2016
Quicken Loans is welcoming a decision for the relocation of a Department of Justice (DOJ) lawsuit to the Eastern District Court in Detroit, where the company is headquartered

Quicken Loans is welcoming a decision for the relocation of a Department of Justice (DOJ) lawsuit to the Eastern District Court in Detroit, where the company is headquartered.

The DOJ lawsuit accuses sued Quicken Loans of committing fraud on loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and sought to try the case in the District of Columbia. However, U.S. District Court Judge Reggie B. Walton ruled against the DOJ and supported the company’s claims that it made sense to try the case in Michigan since all stakeholders, transactions and records were based in the state.

“I think it is becoming increasingly clear what we have known all along: The DOJ case against Quicken Loans has absolutely no merit,” said Dan Gilbert, Quicken Loans’ founder and chairman. “Quicken Loans is the gold standard for residential lending in this country. We have had the FHA’s lowest delinquency and default rates in the nation for years, resulting in billions of dollars of profits to the FHA insurance fund. It is obvious the DOJ made a conscious decision to exert pressure on the largest lenders in the country, using the weight of the federal government and its endless capacity to bring lengthy litigation and corresponding reputational damage without regard for the actual validity of its claims. DOJ’s strategy was deployed for the sole purpose of extracting large settlements. We do not succumb to these egregious tactics. Quicken Loans’ outstanding reputation hard-earned over 31 years is not for sale.”

About the author
Published
Nov 16, 2016
In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."

Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Banning NTRAPS

The new law prohibits the recording of NTRAPS in property records, creates penalties if NTRAPS are recorded, and provides for the removal of NTRAPS currently in place.