Skip to main content

Compliance Matters: Multiple Advertisements

May 24, 2017

Question: We have an advertisement on our Web site and we also send out an e-mail advertisement that is the same as the Web site ad. Are these considered a single advertisement? If so, what are the obligations for each advertisement?
 
Answer
Multiple advertisements in any media, such as Web page advertisements on a Web site corresponding to a newsletter blast or in a catalog, are considered a single advertisement if the following criteria apply:
 
►A trigger term is used;
►Such term requires a table or schedule in order to provide information regarding a finance charge associated with the trigger term, or any other term is used that appears in the opening disclosures;
►The advertisement clearly and conspicuously sets forth or is required to set forth the foregoing table or schedule; and
►These advertisements are required to refer and/or provide access to such table or schedule.
 
Put otherwise, single advertisement guidelines apply for any advertisement where a statement of finance charge is required for a trigger term, or disclosure is required in opening disclosures for any other term, where the trigger term or other term appear in a catalog or advertisement, thereby requiring clear and conspicuous reference to the page or location where the mandated table or schedule begins. [12 CFR § 226.16(c)(1), 2010]
 
For instance, in any advertisement where a trigger term necessitates a statement of finance charge—indeed, any other term that appears in opening disclosures pursuant to Regulation Z § 226.6—the advertisement must clearly refer to the page, Web page, or any media location where a table or schedule is found and begins.
 
Therefore, in each online Web site ad and its corresponding newsletter ad, a hyperlink to the table or schedule containing required additional information should be provided for a trigger term requiring a statement of finance charge and/or any other term that appears in opening disclosures. [12 CFR Supplement I to Part 226 – Official Staff Commentary 12 CFR § 226.16(c)(1)-2, 2010]
Jonathan Foxx is managing director of Lenders Compliance Group, the first and only full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the United States, specializing exclusively in outsourced mortgage compliance and offering a suite of services in residential mortgage banking for banks and non-banks. Information contained in this article is not intended to be and is not a source of legal advice. If you would like to contribute a question, please submit it to [email protected].

This article originally appeared in the January 2017 print edition of National Mortgage Professional Magazine. 
About the author
Published
May 24, 2017
Fed Rate Could Be Down To 4.6% By Year's End

Inflation must hit its 2% goal for Fed to reduce rates.

New Compliance Requirements Add Challenges

Latest changes arrive at an already disruptive time in the mortgage industry

Changes Coming For Investment Properties

Using leases to qualify will require Proof

FCC Adopts New Rules To Close The 'Lead Generator Loophole'

Mortgage lead providers respond, saying this will "wipe out" several small and mid-tier businesses

Trade Associations & Lenders Stand Behind Trigger Leads Bill

Major trade associations like The MBA, NAMB, and BAC, urge action on S. 3502.

Supply And Demand Are Still Alive And Well

Treasury auctions may face weaker demand but they’re still getting done