Skip to main content

Regulatory Compliance Outlook: “Intent to Proceed” and the new GFE

Apr 13, 2010

Disclaimer: The views, opinions and advice expressed in the following piece should not be taken as legal advice and do not reflect the views of National Mortgage Professional Magazine, the National Association of Mortgage Brokers (NAMB), the National Association of Professional Mortgage Women (NAPMW) or the National Credit Reporting Association (NCRA). You should consult your own legal counsel for professional advice. Since the introduction of the new Good Faith Estimate (GFE), several readers of this column have written to me about their concern regarding the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development’s (HUD’s) new requirement for a waiting period to elapse before collecting fees from the consumer, other than the credit report fee. HUD has taken the recently-revised Federal Reserve Board Truth-in-Lending (TILA) regulations—which limit fees, charged in connection with early disclosures, and defines the timely provision of the disclosures—and incorporates this rule into a way of permitting the borrower to shop for a mortgage loan without paying upfront fees that, in HUD’s view, impede shopping. That TILA rule, simply stated, is that creditors are not permitted to impose a fee on a consumer in connection with the consumer’s application for a mortgage before the consumer has received the TILA disclosure. The Federal Reserve Board makes an exception that allows imposition of a fee that is bona fide and reasonable in amount for obtaining the consumer’s credit history. (73 FR 44522, July 30, 2008) HUD has a public policy goal of creating a “circumstance” where consumers can shop for a mortgage loan without paying significant upfront fees that may impede shopping. Consequently, HUD has, in effect, adopted the Federal Reserve Board’s rule, limiting the charge originators may impose on consumers for delivery of the GFE. Specifically, HUD is limiting the fee for the GFE to the cost of a credit report, and a loan originator is expressly not permitted to charge, as a condition of providing a GFE, any fee for an appraisal, inspection or similar settlement service. To be clear, the loan originator may not accept payment from the consumer—except for the payment of a credit report fee—in any form whatsoever, such as by a post-dated check or an unprocessed credit card impression, or any other kind of payment method which could constitute constructive receipt of payment. Furthermore, and of greater significance, HUD has imposed an additional requirement that affects the collection of fees from a consumer: The loan originator may collect fees beyond the cost of a credit report for origination-related services only after a loan applicant both receives a GFE and indicates an intention to proceed with the loan covered by the GFE. Note the two requirements: (1) The delivery of the GFE to the loan applicant; and (2) The loan applicant’s notification of an intention to proceed with the loan covered by the GFE. It is not until both conditions are satisfied that a loan originator may collect fees from a loan applicant for services, other than the cost of obtaining a credit report. Thus, a loan originator must issue a GFE no later than three business days after the loan originator receives an application or information sufficient to complete an application and must be notified of the loan applicant’s intent to proceed before collecting fees, with the exception of the credit report fee. There is a remedy and we have counseled our clients to implement it for their residential mortgage loan applications. Either by written or verbal methods, our clients now use a form, entitled “Intent to Proceed With Mortgage Loan Application.” The written form, subtitled Applicant(s) Certification, contains the following written affirmations, is signed by the loan applicant, and returned with the application package (alternatively, the loan applicant may contact the loan officer to offer verbal affirmations): ►The initial GFE has been provided within three business days of the application date (business days, excluding Sundays and specified, legal holidays). ►The initial GFE was received. ►I/We intend to proceed with the loan application based on the initial GFE. ►Other than a credit report fee, no fees were charged prior to receiving the GFE. The fourth bullet contains the essential words about the applicant’s intention to proceed with the loan application based on the initial GFE. The verbal form, subtitled “Loan Originator Certification,” is used by loan officers and requires their signed attestation, and contains the following verbal affirmations: ►The initial GFE was provided to the applicant(s) within three business days of the application date (business days, excluding Sundays and specified, legal holidays). ►The applicant(s) received the initial GFE. ►The applicant(s) intend to proceed with the loan application based on the initial GFE. ►Other than a credit report fee, no fees were charged to the applicant(s) prior to receiving the GFE. It is important that a statement on both the applicant(s) Certification and Loan Originator Certification Forms include, but not be limited to, further indicating that the subject form itself is not a loan commitment; the loan originator cannot guaranty acceptance into any loan program, specific loan terms or conditions; and the loan application is subject to credit approval, acceptable property appraisal, title report, and satisfactory completion of conditions stated in commitment or approval letter. Submit your questions … Do you have a regulatory compliance issue that you’d like to see addressed in the Regulatory Compliance Outlook Column? If so, e-mail your issue or concern to Jonathan Foxx at [email protected]. Jonathan Foxx, former chief compliance officer for two of the country’s top publicly-traded residential mortgage loan originators, is the president and managing director of Lenders Compliance Group, a mortgage risk management firm devoted to providing regulatory compliance advice and counsel to the mortgage industry. He may be contacted at (516) 442-3456 or by e-mail at [email protected].  
About the author
Apr 13, 2010
In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."

Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Banning NTRAPS

The new law prohibits the recording of NTRAPS in property records, creates penalties if NTRAPS are recorded, and provides for the removal of NTRAPS currently in place.