Skip to main content

ACA Financial Guaranty Sues Goldman Sachs for Fraud Over Bad CDOs

Jan 07, 2011

ACA Financial Guaranty Corporation (ACA) has filed suit against Goldman Sachs & Company for fraud and unjust enrichment in connection with a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) called ABACUS 2007-AC1 (ABACUS), which Goldman Sachs developed and sold on behalf of its hedge fund client Paulson & Company Inc. in 2007. ACA was misled by Goldman’s fraudulent activities and is seeking $30 million in compensatory and $90 million in punitive damages. According to the complaint, filed in the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, this fraud action arises from the egregious conduct of Goldman Sachs in developing and marketing ABACUS based on a portfolio of investment securities selected largely by its hedge fund client, Paulson. Goldman Sachs’s scheme was to design ABACUS to fail, so that Paulson could reap huge profits by shorting the portfolio and Goldman Sachs could reap huge investment banking fees. Goldman Sachs fraudulently induced ACA to take a long position in and provide guaranty insurance for ABACUS. Goldman Sachs did so by deceiving ACA into believing that Paulson also was to be a long investor in ABACUS. In fact, as Goldman Sachs knew, Paulson intended instead to take an enormous short position in ABACUS, reaping nearly $1 billion when the portfolio failed. As the complaint alleges: “ABACUS was worthless at the time Goldman Sachs marketed it to ACA. Had Paulson’s true role as a short investor selecting the portfolio been known, neither ACA nor anyone else would have taken a long position in it. Because of Goldman Sachs’s deceit—which led ACA to reasonably believe that ABACUS was a valuable product selected by the equity investor with identical objectives—ACA invested in what was in fact a worthless product. Goldman Sachs engaged in this egregious misconduct notwithstanding that it expressly acknowledged that its participation presented ‘reputational risk’ and after at least one other major investment bank declined to participate for that very reason.” Goldman Sachs has since settled SEC civil charges arising out of this fraudulent conduct, agreeing to pay a $550 million fine.
About the author
Published
Jan 07, 2011
No FHA-Insured Loans For Non-Permanent U.S. Residents

In March 26 letter, HUD states change is effective May 25, aligns with Trump Administration policies

GSEs Ordered To Terminate Special Purpose Credit Programs

Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s current support for such SPCP programs is ‘inappropriate,’ FHFA has determined

Housing Shake-Up: HUD And FHFA Slash Staff, Close Offices

Federal housing agencies undergo sweeping cuts as Trump administration pushes aggressive downsizing

Plans to Build 3 Million New Houses

Selling and leasing government land is part of the Trump Administration’s initiative to spur the housing market

Mar 20, 2025
New FHFA Director To Prioritize Efficiency Over GSE Re-Privatization

Industry groups applaud Bill Pulte’s confirmation as FHFA Director, pledge to work on U.S. housing affordability ‘crisis’

NMP Readers Respond: What Should Become Of The CFPB?

55% said downsize the CFPB, 45% said don't, but survey comments revealed much more