Beyond ML 2008-38: The 800-Pound Can of Worms – NMP Skip to main content

Beyond ML 2008-38: The 800-Pound Can of Worms

Apr 07, 2011

After more than two years of single-handedly urging U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) to revoke Mortgagee Letter 2008-38, it finally listened, under legal and political pressure. HUD issued Mortgagee Letter 2011-16 on Tuesday, April 5, 2011, rescinding the odious Mortgagee Letter 2008-38 (Dec. 5, 2008), the cause of ongoing litigation brought by a widower and two widows (the “AARP case” March 8, 2011), among hundreds of seniors across the America who have been recklessly hurt by the application of ML 2008-38 as alleged in the federal lawsuit. Besides being two years late, Mortgagee Letter 2011-16 is a clumsy legal maneuver as well as an admission that Mortgagee Letter 2008-38 was (and is) a colossal mistake that has injured seniors and exposed lenders, servicers, and HUD (taxpayers) to potentially huge legal, financial and reputational risks. I say “clumsy legal maneuver” because while it may have been issued to blunt the AARP lawsuit, it actually buttresses the case against HUD. More troubling, in rescinding ML 2008-38, HUD leaves HECM non-recourse policy in doubt, putting seniors, counselors, and lenders in regulatory limbo on a crucial issue in the nation’s reverse mortgage industry. The 800-pound can of worms in the “AARP case”—HUD’s almost 22-year scandalous failure to protect non-borrowing spouses in HECM transactions by willfully and arrogantly refusing to implement the anti-displacement provision of the HECM Statute—is not going away. It has the potential to become the grandmother of all legal and financial exposure for HUD and lenders, thanks to the superior legal minds at HUD who substituted their bureaucratic judgment for a clear federal law. I believe the non-implementation of the anti-displacement law, Mortgagee Letters 2008-38, 2006-25, 2011-16, and other HECM policy letters call into question the judgment and competence of some of the legal counsel at HUD. The best risk-management decision Secretary Shaun Donovan and Acting FHA Commissioner Robert Ryan can make today is to clean house at the highest level of HUD’s servicing and legal departments. Atare E. Agbamu is author of Think Reverse! and more than 140 articles on reverse mortgages. Since 2002, he writes the nationally-distributed column, “Forward on Reverse.” A former director of reverse mortgages at Minneapolis-based AdvisorNet Mortgage LLC, Agbamu has years of hands-on experience marketing and originating reverse mortgages. Through his advisory, ThinkReverse LLC, Agbamu advises financial professionals, institutions and regulators across the country. In a 2007 national report on reverse mortgages, AARP cited Agbamu’s work. He can be reached by phone at (612) 203-9434 and e-mail at [email protected].
About the author
Published
Apr 07, 2011
MISMO Updates Mortgage Insurance Standards To Support FICO 10T, VantageScore 4.0

New implementation guide standardizes mortgage insurance data exchange, helping lenders, insurers and technology providers prepare systems for newer credit scoring models

Congress Weighs New Roadmap To End Fannie, Freddie Conservatorship

Rep. Scott Fitzgerald's three-bill housing package would establish a statutory framework for releasing the GSEs while expanding construction lending and easing some TRID compliance requirements

CHLA Backs Bank Capital Proposal, Questions Impact On Mortgage Lending

Trade group supports lower mortgage risk weights but says broader market forces — not capital rules — drove banks' retreat from the market

Senate Passes 21st Century ROAD To Housing Act In 85-5 Vote

Sweeping housing package heads back to House after Senate clears final version with broad bipartisan support

MISMO Updates Business Glossary To Support AI, eMortgages

New definitions covering eHELOCs, remote online notarization, valuation modernization, and compliance initiatives aim to improve consistency

Underwriters Don’t Slow Down Loans. They Eliminate Uncertainty.

ndustry’s biggest bottleneck is not underwriting itself — it is the uncertainty that reaches underwriting too late in the process. When validation happens upstream, speed follows naturally.