LexisNexis Risk Solutions has issued its 15th Annual Mortgage Fraud Report, spotlighting three economic indicators—mortgage fraud and misrepresentation activity involving industry professionals, potential collusion activity, and for the first time, new data showing the volume of properties in default—and their impact on the implosion of the U.S. housing market over the past five years.
Analysis of all loans investigated in 2012 and submitted to MIDEX shows a five-year high of 69 percent of all reports received having some type of application misrepresentation or fraud. Similarly, when focusing on just those loans originated in 2012, 61 percent report application misrepresentation and/or fraud. This is up from 49 percent of loans originated in 2011 and 43 percent in 2010.
The LexisNexis Annual Mortgage Fraud Report examines the current composition of residential mortgage fraud and misrepresentation in the U.S. committed by industry professionals, based on data submitted to the LexisNexis Mortgage Industry Data Exchange (MIDEX).
“This year’s study suggests that the more shared problematic economic indicators a state has, the greater its financial challenges will be in the coming years,” said Tom Brown, senior vice president, Financial Services, LexisNexis. “With Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) mortgage regulations going into effect in January 2014, and demanding new rules for quality loans, it will be interesting to see what impact this has on overall mortgage defaults.”
The study highlights state rankings information, including:
►New Jersey was the only state in the study that made it on all three top 10 lists for mortgage fraud and misrepresentation reported to MIDEX, potential collusion and property defaults.
►Five states appear on both the Investigation and Origination Mortgage Fraud Indices (MFIs) and the newly-established list of Property Default Rankings: Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Nevada and Ohio.
►Ohio, which ranked first on the Origination MFI list, with a ranking of 224, had more than two times the expected rate of fraud or misrepresentation based on origination volume.
►Five states — Arizona, California, Florida, New Jersey and New York — occupy space on both the Investigation and Origination MFIs.
►Eight states — Alabama, Delaware, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, New York and Vermont — rank highly on both Collusion Indicator Indices (CIIs) as areas with high percentages of potential non-arm’s length transaction activity.
For the first time in the study, a nationwide aggregation of available LexisNexis property data was used to determine states most likely suffering from the largest percentage of properties in default. Florida and Nevada experienced the most dramatic decreases in properties in default even though they were ranked first and fourth, respectively, on the list for 2012.