Skip to main content

S&P Announces $1.37 Billion Settlement With U.S. Justice Department

Feb 03, 2015

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has reached a settlement with Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (S&P Ratings) stemming from the DOJ's February 2013 lawsuit regarding the quality of ratings issued on certain U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and U.S. collateralized debt obligation between 2004 and 2007.

In a statement issued by S&P Ratings’ parent company, McGraw Hill Financial Inc., the ratings agency will pay $687.5 million to the DOJ and $687.5 million to 19 states and the District of Columbia, which filed their own lawsuits. The settlement, according to McGraw Hill, “Contains no findings of violations of law by the company, S&P Financial Services or S&P Ratings.”

The settlement is not subject to court approval.

The DOJ brought its lawsuit against S&P in February 2013. At that time, the Department tried to pressure S&P Ratings and McGraw Hill to pay a fine of more than $1 billion and agree to the admission of wrongdoing to at least one count of fraud. The companies refused to acquiesce to the Department’s demands. To date, S&P is the only ratings agency that has been pursued by the DOJ in connection to questionable RMBS ratings in the years prior to the 2008 economic crash.

In addition, S&P Ratings reached a separate settlement with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) to resolve its claims regarding problematic ratings on three structured investment vehicles. Under this settlement, S&P Ratings will pay CalPERS $125 million in a settlement that is not subject to judicial approval. 

About the author
Published
Feb 03, 2015
Mortgage Servicers Added To Junk-Fee Naughty List

New release from CFPB lays out areas of improvement, and concern, for mortgage servicers.

In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."