CFPB Hits RMK/Majestic With $250k Fine for Abusing VA and FHA Branding – NMP Skip to main content

CFPB Hits RMK/Majestic With $250k Fine for Abusing VA and FHA Branding

Apr 10, 2015

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has taken action against RMK Financial Corporation for deceptive mortgage advertising practices, including ads that led consumers to believe that the company was affiliated with the U.S. government. The CFPB is ordering RMK to end its illegal and deceptive practices and pay a civil penalty of $250,000. 

“Deceptive advertising has no place in the mortgage marketplace, and the Consumer Bureau will continue to take action against companies that mislead consumers with false claims of government affiliation,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Today’s action sends a clear message that misleading consumers is illegal, unacceptable, and will not be tolerated.”  

RMK Financial Corporation is a California-based mortgage lender which also does business under the name Majestic Home Loans. RMK mailed print advertisements to more than 100,000 consumers in several states, using the names and logos of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) in a way that falsely implied that the advertisements were sent by the VA or FHA, or that the company or the advertised mortgage products were endorsed or sponsored by the VA or FHA. RMK sent its advertisements to tens of thousands of U.S. military servicemembers and veterans, and other holders of VA-guaranteed mortgages. 

The company’s typical advertisement for VA mortgages featured the VA seal and logo at the top of the page and described its loan products as part of a “distinctive program offered by the U.S. government.” The ad instructed consumers to call the “VA Interest Rate Reduction Department” at a phone number that in fact belonged to RMK. Some mailers were labeled “FHA Benefits” and included an image of the Statue of Liberty on the outside, along with warnings citing the U.S. Code and threatening fines and imprisonment for tampering with the letter. 

RMK’s ads also contained misrepresentations about the loans’ interest rates and estimated monthly payments, including whether the interest rate was fixed or variable. Consumers who called the company were sometimes given misleading information over the phone; in some cases RMK employees told callers or implied that RMK was endorsed by the VA or FHA. 

The CFPB’s investigation found that RMK’s practices violated the Truth-in-Lending Act (TILA), the Mortgage Acts and Practices (MAP) Rule, and other federal consumer laws. The MAP Rule prohibits misleading claims in mortgage advertising, including implying a government affiliation. Under the terms of today’s consent order, RMK will be prohibited from falsely implying a government affiliation in future advertisements. It will also pay a civil penalty of $250,000.

In mid-February, the CFPB took action against three mortgage companies for similar offenses th those of RMK. The CFPB sued reverse mortgage lender All Financial Services, seeking to halt its illegal activities, and ordered Flagship Financial Group and American Preferred Lending to end their false advertising.

About the author
Published
Apr 10, 2015
New Appraisal Rules Could Vary By Lender Under GSE Exception

Fannie and Freddie are giving some lenders more time to adopt UAD 3.6, meaning mortgage brokers may need to navigate different appraisal requirements across wholesale partners

Credit-Score Competition Could Expand Beyond FICO, VantageScore

CHLA sees new Fannie and Freddie score disclosures as a first step toward more competition, while lenders are already finding different borrower outcomes under today's models

Mortgage AI Survey Finds Monitoring Gap At Smaller Lenders

Only 40% of smaller lenders surveyed reported ongoing AI monitoring, compared with 80% of larger lenders, as a new state examiner guide details the records regulators may request

Fannie Changes How Rent From A Former Home Counts

Fannie now prohibits leases for departing residences and permits market-analysis tools instead of Form 1007, creating a key documentation difference from Freddie Mac

ACES Targets Loans Traditional QC Samples May Miss

New population-testing technology applies lender-defined rules across selected origination and servicing records, then directs flagged files to human reviewers

Sep 21, 2026
The Risk Your Credit Score Can't See

Place-based market risk can produce dramatically different default outcomes among borrowers with nearly identical credit profiles

Sep 17, 2026