AML Law and Best Practices – NMP Skip to main content

AML Law and Best Practices

Jul 28, 2016

Question: In implementing our AML program, we recognize there are the basic requirements of the law. However, what is the difference between what is required by law and what are best practices for an AML compliance program?

Answer
Frankly, the law is very general, even vague at times, with respect to distinguishing it and best practices. The result often leaves those who must implement an AML compliance program with little practical guidance as to what should be done.
Over time, industry participants develop ways to comply with the legal requirements for compliance programs. As methods are adopted within the industry, they may be referred to as “industry standards.”

When clearly better ways to comply emerge, they may be referred to as “best practices.” But not all industry standards or best practices will be legally compliant. Therefore, compliance with an industry standard or even a best practice may not satisfy the legal requirements.

At minimum, an organization should consider having a basic set of policies and procedures for assessing its risks for money laundering and terrorist financing. The institution should also have policies and procedures for conducting due diligence on its customers, clients, employees and agents, vendors and third-part service providers. In addition, the policies and procedures should cover how the organization deters, detects and monitors for suspicious activity. Other policies and procedures should be included to address training and how the organization handles legal process, reports suspicious activity and otherwise cooperates with law enforcement and other entities. [FFIEC Exam Manual, 33]

An organization that is affiliated with other types of entities should also consider adopting policies and procedures that apply on an enterprise-wide or institution-wide basis. Such procedures should permit organization within the enterprise to view their customers’ activity across multiply business lines and geographies. [FFIEC Exam Manual, 160]



Jonathan Foxx is president and managing director of Lenders Compliance Group, Brokers Compliance Group, Servicers Compliance Group and Vendors Compliance Group, national companies devoted to providing regulatory compliance advice and counsel to the mortgage industry. He may be contacted by phone at (516) 442-3456, by e-mail at [email protected] or visit LendersComplianceGroup.com

About the author
Published
Jul 28, 2016
Insuring The Risk To Lenders At Closing

Traditional protections like title insurance and closing protection letters may leave lenders exposed to significant settlement, funding, and fraud-related losses

CHLA Uses Trump Mortgage Order To Renew Push For LO Comp Reform

Community lenders want more flexibility over employee compensation, closing-cost estimates, down payment assistance, and federal supervision of smaller IMBs

Servicers Begin Testing Systems Ahead of VA Partial Claim Deadline

VA lenders and servicers have until Nov. 28 to implement the new loss mitigation waterfall and Partial Claim Program

ROAD Act’s Housing Incentive May Be Too Small To Move Supply

Realtor.com finds the median city risks losing only about $84,000, although the policy could carry more weight in supply-starved Northeast and Midwest markets

CRA Proposal Could Reshape Bank Lending And Affordable Housing Investment

The OCC and FDIC would put more weight on lending while easing community development requirements for hundreds of banks

Fannie Mae AI Governance Deadline Arrives Aug. 6

Seller/servicers using artificial intelligence in origination or servicing must have formal policies, oversight, and vendor controls in place