HUD Sued Over Suspending Obama-Era Fair Housing Rule – NMP Skip to main content

HUD Sued Over Suspending Obama-Era Fair Housing Rule

May 08, 2018
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal brought by Nomura Holdings Inc. and the Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC

A trio of nonprofit advocacy groups—The National Fair Housing Alliance (NFHA), Texas Appleseed and Texas Low Income Housing Information Service—filed a lawsuit to force the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to reinstate an Obama-era “affirmatively further fair housing” (AFFH) requirement that local and state governments address segregated housing patterns as a condition of receiving HUD funding. 
 
The AFFH was enacted in 2015. In their lawsuit, the groups charged HUD with unlawfully suspending the requirement in January for six years, which they claimed would “effectively removing civil rights oversight of as much as $5.5 billion per year until 2024 or later for almost 1,000 jurisdictions.” The Texas-based nonprofits suing HUD asserted that the AFFH rule is needed “as a bulwark against an unequal rebuilding process in the wake of Hurricane Harvey.”
 
“For 30 years, NFHA has promoted the affirmatively furthering fair housing requirement of the Fair Housing Act,” said NFHA President and CEO Lisa Rice. “We have advocated to HUD to release an effective AFFH Rule, educated jurisdictions, fair housing groups and community-based organizations about the AFFH requirements, and implemented programs designed to further fair housing. Each day HUD holds up requiring jurisdictions to fully comply with the law is another day that millions of people are being denied fair housing opportunities. HUD’s action is a clear example of ‘justice delayed, justice denied.’”
 
HUD did not immediately comment on the lawsuit. The plaintiffs are being represented in their litigation by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the law firm of Relman, Dane & Colfax PLLC, the American Civil Liberties Union, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., the Poverty & Race Research Action Council and Public Citizen Litigation Group.

 
About the author
Published
May 08, 2018
New Appraisal Rules Could Vary By Lender Under GSE Exception

Fannie and Freddie are giving some lenders more time to adopt UAD 3.6, meaning mortgage brokers may need to navigate different appraisal requirements across wholesale partners

Credit-Score Competition Could Expand Beyond FICO, VantageScore

CHLA sees new Fannie and Freddie score disclosures as a first step toward more competition, while lenders are already finding different borrower outcomes under today's models

Mortgage AI Survey Finds Monitoring Gap At Smaller Lenders

Only 40% of smaller lenders surveyed reported ongoing AI monitoring, compared with 80% of larger lenders, as a new state examiner guide details the records regulators may request

Fannie Changes How Rent From A Former Home Counts

Fannie now prohibits leases for departing residences and permits market-analysis tools instead of Form 1007, creating a key documentation difference from Freddie Mac

ACES Targets Loans Traditional QC Samples May Miss

New population-testing technology applies lender-defined rules across selected origination and servicing records, then directs flagged files to human reviewers

Sep 21, 2026
The Risk Your Credit Score Can't See

Place-based market risk can produce dramatically different default outcomes among borrowers with nearly identical credit profiles

Sep 17, 2026