NAR and Real Estate Brokerages Face Class-Action Lawsuit – NMP Skip to main content

NAR and Real Estate Brokerages Face Class-Action Lawsuit

Mar 11, 2019
The U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) has charged Plano, Texas landlords Quang Dangtran and his wife, Ha Nguyen, with violating the Fair Housing Act by refusing to lease a room to a prospective tenant because she is African-American

An anti-trust class action lawsuit has been brought against the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and four prominent real estate brokerage firms—Warren Buffett’s HomeServices of America, Keller Williams, Realogy and RE/MAX—over allegations of inflated commission rates and anticompetitive practices.
 
The lawsuit, filed on Mar. 6 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, accuses NAR and the four companies working together to maintain a lock in 25 major markets that prevents competition from other brokerages and forces home sellers, home purchasers, and real estate brokers from negotiating over the commissions that sellers pay for the transaction.
 
“When you compare commission rates in these affected housing markets to those in countries with competitive real-estate broker markets, the numbers tell a very clear story,” said Steve Berman, Managing Partner of Hagens Berman and attorney representing home sellers in the class action. “We believe that NAR and the Big Four have devised a series of checks on broker commission rates to all but guarantee their goal of price-fixing, costing home sellers thousands in excessive commissions paid on each sale.”
 
The lawsuit charges NAR and the companies with violating the Sherman Act by only allowing listing brokers to list a property on an MLS if the listing broker makes a unilateral, non-negotiable offer of compensation on the MLS to buyer brokers. Real estate brokers cannot disclose from disclosing commissions offered on MLS, the lawsuit adds, and also allows brokers to take both buyer and seller commissions, if the buyer is not represented by a broker.
 
“Under these policies straight out of NAR’s handbook, sellers suffer, and brokers reap the spoils,” Berman said. “NAR and the Big Four are doing absolutely everything in their power to restrict and control real-estate broker commissions, and our antitrust team intends to put an end it.”
 
Plaintiffs in the case are also represented by attorneys at Cohen Milstein, Handley Farah & Anderson, Justice Catalyst Law, Wright Marsh & Levy and Teske Katz Kitzer & Rochel.

 
About the author
Published
Mar 11, 2019
MISMO Updates Business Glossary To Support AI, eMortgages

New definitions covering eHELOCs, remote online notarization, valuation modernization, and compliance initiatives aim to improve consistency

MISMO Launches AI Governance Framework For Mortgage Lenders

New FRAME toolkit gives lenders, servicers, and technology providers a roadmap for managing AI risk while supporting innovation

CFPB Tells Lenders Immigration Status Can Factor Into ATR Analysis

CFPB frames immigration status as a potential ability-to-repay factor when future U.S.-based income is at risk

UAD 3.6 Deadline Nears; First American Earns Verification

First American's ACI Sky Workbench gains verification ahead of the Nov. 2 implementation date for the GSEs' updated appraisal reporting requirements

MISMO Introduces New Loan Boarding Standard

Wrapper Files support standardized data transfers between origination and servicing systems, with potential savings of $60 to $160 per loan

The GLBA Compliance Gap Your AI Deployment Just Opened

Old statutes, new models, and the vendor contract you signed before machine learning became operational