Skip to main content

Class action suit filed against Countrywide involving $350 billion of MBS

Jul 15, 2010

The law firm of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC has filed an amended consolidated class action complaint in its landmark litigation against Countrywide Financial Corporation and other underwriter defendants who were prominently involved in the failure of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) over the last several years. Countrywide, since acquired by Bank of America, was one of the largest and most controversial institutions involved in the MBS market. Other defendants in the case, aside from Countrywide, several of its former top executives, and Bank of America, include 16 underwriters of more than $350 billion in Countrywide securities, among them JP Morgan, Deutsche Bank, Bear Stearns, UBS, Morgan Stanley, Edward Jones, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse. Cohen Milstein is lead counsel for the class and counsel for the lead plaintiff, the Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System, as well as the Oregon Public Employees' Retirement System and Orange County Employees' Retirement System. The General Board of Pension and Health Benefits of the United Methodist Church is also named as a plaintiff in the litigation. "Amidst all this high finance, it's too easy to lose sight of the fact that pension funds invested heavily in these mortgage-backed securities and so retirees are the real victims here," said Steve Toll, managing partner at Cohen Milstein and co-chair of its securities fraud/investor protection practice group. In the amended complaint, the plaintiffs further buttress their allegation that the defendants published false and misleading offering documents, including registration statements, prospectuses, and prospectus supplements. Specifically, these documents misrepresented or failed to disclose that underwriting guidelines for the mortgages backing the securities had been systematically disregarded. According to the lawsuit, from 2005 through 2007 Countrywide was the nation's largest residential mortgage lender, originating in excess of $850 billion in home loans throughout the United States in 2005 and 2006 alone. Countrywide's ability to originate residential mortgages on such a massive scale was facilitated, in large part, by its ability to rapidly package or securitize those loans and then, through the activities of the underwriter defendants, sell them to investors as purportedly investment grade MBS. In order to generate a steady flow of mortgage loans to sustain this mass production of MBS, Countrywide routinely issued loans to borrowers who otherwise would never have qualified for them—and indeed, did not qualify for the loans they received—through, for example, "low doc" and "no doc" loan programs, often with adjustable interest rates that had been designed for borrowers with higher incomes and better credit. Upon pooling these mortgages and issuing them as MBS certificates, more than 92 percent received the very highest, investment-grade ratings from rating agencies; ultimately, however, 87 percent were downgraded to junk. Tellingly, one year after the date of the certificate offerings, delinquency and default rates on the underlying mortgages had increased 2,525 percent from issuance. In explaining such an unprecedented collapse in ratings on these certificates in 2008 and 2009, the rating agencies noted that they were forced to change their models because of previously undisclosed and systematic "aggressive underwriting" practices used to originate the mortgage loan collateral. Along with the exponential increases in delinquency and default rates of the underlying mortgages and the collapse of the certificates' ratings, the value of the certificates plummeted. Plaintiffs' complaint alleges that the Defendants' actions violated Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, legislation, still on the books, originally enacted in response to similar abuses that led to the Great Depression. The Countrywide case is pending before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Cohen Milstein has been named lead or co-lead counsel by courts in eight of the most significant MBS cases currently being litigated, including Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual, as well as Countrywide. For more information, visit www.cmht.com.  
About the author
Published
Jul 15, 2010
Bank On Borrowers, Not Rate Predictions

Chasing rate forecasts wastes resources better spent on cold, hard business

Dec 10, 2024
Rocket Mortgage Sues HUD Over Regulatory, Enforcement Discrepancies

Rocket seeks dismissal of the DOJ's October lawsuit alleging the lender committed racial appraisal bias.

Dec 05, 2024
West Capital Lending Acquires Locally-Focused Brokerage, Red Tree Mortgage

The 2024 Broker Brawl reaffirmed West Capital's commitment as a relationship-focused lender

Dec 03, 2024
First FICO 10T-Backed MBS Issuance Achieved

Comprised of VA loans, the pool offers proof of concept for changes to be required by the FHFA by late 2025.

Dec 03, 2024
BAC Co-Founder Reveals Mega Brokers May Undergo CFPB Audits

Brendan McKay of BAC revealed the main takeaways in a LinkedIn post

Dec 02, 2024
AnnieMac Data Breach Impacts 171,000 Customers

Letters detailing the Aug. 23 breach were mailed to thousands of affected customers across multiple states last week.

Nov 18, 2024