Citigroup to pay SEC's $75 million penalty for misleading investors on sub-prime loans – NMP Skip to main content

Citigroup to pay SEC's $75 million penalty for misleading investors on sub-prime loans

NationalMortgageProfessional.com
Jul 29, 2010

The Securities and Exchange Commission has charged Citigroup Inc. with misleading investors about the company's exposure to sub-prime mortgage-related assets. The SEC also charged one current and one former executive for their roles in causing Citigroup to make the misleading statements in an SEC filing. The SEC alleges that, in response to intense investor interest on the topic, Citigroup repeatedly made misleading statements in earnings calls and public filings about the extent of its holdings of assets backed by sub-prime mortgages. Between July and mid-October 2007, Citigroup represented that sub-prime exposure in its investment banking unit was $13 billion or less, when in fact it was more than $50 billion. "Even as late as fall 2007, as the mortgage market was rapidly deteriorating, Citigroup boasted of superior risk management skills in reducing its subprime exposure to approximately $13 billion. In fact, billions more in CDO and other subprime exposure sat on its books undisclosed to investors," said Robert Khuzami, director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement. "The rules of financial disclosure are simple—if you choose to speak, speak in full and not in half-truths." Citigroup and the two executives have agreed to settle the SEC's charges. Citigroup agreed to pay a $75 million penalty. Former chief financial officer Gary Crittenden agreed to pay $100,000, and former head of investor relations Arthur Tildesley Jr., (currently the head of cross marketing at Citigroup) agreed to pay $80,000. According to the SEC's complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Citigroup represented in earnings calls and public filings from July 20 to Oct. 15, 2007, that its investment bank's sub-prime exposure was $13 billion or less and had declined over the course of 2007. However, the $13 billion figure reported by Citigroup omitted two categories of sub-prime-backed assets: "super senior" tranches of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and "liquidity puts." Citigroup had more than $40 billion of additional sub-prime exposure in these categories, which it didn't disclose until November 2007 after a decline in their value. The SEC's complaint alleges that as early as April 2007, Citigroup's senior management began to gather information on the investment bank's sub-prime exposure for purposes of possible public disclosure. From the outset of these efforts, internal documents describing the investment bank's sub-prime exposure included the super senior CDO tranches and the liquidity puts, while noting that they bore little risk of default. Nevertheless on four occasions in 2007, Citigroup stated that its investment bank's sub-prime exposure was reduced to $13 billion from $24 billion at the end of 2006—without disclosing the more than $40 billion in additional sub-prime exposure relating to the super senior CDO tranches and liquidity puts. These occasions included a July 20 earnings call, a July 27 Fixed Income investors call, an Oct. 1 earnings pre-announcement, and an Oct.r 15 earnings call. "Citigroup's improper disclosures came at a critical time when investors were clamoring for details about Wall Street firms' exposure to sub-prime securities," said Scott W. Friestad, associate director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement. "Instead of providing clear and accurate information to the market, Citigroup dropped the ball and made a bad situation worse." According to the SEC's order instituting administrative proceedings against Crittenden and Tildesley, they were repeatedly provided with information about the full extent of Citigroup's subprime exposure. Crittenden received a detailed briefing on valuation issues relating to the super senior tranches of CDOs in early September 2007. Tildesley received information that same month that discussed the possibility that Citigroup's disclosures could be misleading because they did not include the amounts of the super senior tranches and the liquidity puts. The SEC's order finds that both Crittenden and Tildesley helped draft and then approved the disclosures that were included in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC on Oct. 1, 2007. The SEC's order finds that, in doing so, Crittenden and Tildesley caused Citigroup's filing to be misleading to investors. For more information, visit www.sec.gov.
Published
Jul 29, 2010
Freddie Mac Announces Automation Of Key Underwriting Criteria

GSE says verification of assets, income, and employment increases efficiency and reduces risk

Regulation and Compliance
May 27, 2022
Fed Minutes: Peak Target For Benchmark Rate Is 3.13%

Minutes of May meeting reveal discussion of raising rates faster than anticipated.

Regulation and Compliance
May 26, 2022
Senate Confirms Thompson As FHFA Director

Had held title of interim director since June 2021.

Regulation and Compliance
May 26, 2022
Forum Calls For More Inclusive Access to Homeownership

FHFA, policy experts, and journalists join NAR-Urban Institute discussion on accessibility and affordability challenges.

Regulation and Compliance
May 23, 2022
CRA Impact May Not Be As Profound As Feared

CFPB Director Rohit Chopra tells MBA conference changes shouldn’t be difficult

Regulation and Compliance
May 17, 2022
A UDAAP Expansion

The CFPB’s new memo about consumer complaints

Regulation and Compliance
May 17, 2022