Indictments announced in Hawaiian mortgage fraud case – NMP Skip to main content

Indictments announced in Hawaiian mortgage fraud case

Aug 13, 2010

Two indictments of 13 Oahu residents and one from the state of Washington on mortgage fraud related charges have been unsealed with the arrests of 10 of the 14 defendants. A federal grand jury had returned the indictments on Aug. 11, 2010, but they had remained sealed. One indictment charged 10 defendants in 56 counts of conspiracy, wire fraud, and false statements on loan applications, while the other named four defendants in 33 counts of the same nature. The 14 named defendants are: Life imprisonment for each of two counts of willfully communicating classified national defense information to the PRC with the intent that it be used to the advantage of the PRC or to the injury of the United States: ►Estrelita "Esther" Garo Miguel ►Jennifer Garin Miguel  ►Yolie Castillo Tiburcio  ►Vinah Ceriales Morales  ►Geraldine Garin Miguel Lukela  ►Teresita "Tessie" Faeldonea Sorino ►Mary Ann Lapenia  ►Stephen Elmer Callo  ►Felicidad "Felicia" Tabalbag Corpuz (from Washington) ►Albert Lonoikauakini Joy  ►Atlantica Kahaunani "Nani" Tanuvasa  ►Lene Tanuvasa Jr.  ►Samantha Michel  ►Michelle Lee Malulani Kama  Florence T. Nakakuni, United States Attorney for the District of Hawaii, said that according to the indictments, the purposes of the conspiracies and fraud schemes were to defraud lending institutions and others by submitting loan documents containing false information. The two indictments allege that certain defendants recruited individuals to apply for mortgage loans and to sign loan documents containing false representations, and that some defendants were loan officers who submitted fraudulent loan applications. In reliance on the false statements, the lending institutions funded the loans, and some of the defendants then distributed the loan proceeds, as well as collected their standard fees and commissions. For the conspiracy count, the defendants face a maximum period of imprisonment of five years and a maximum fine of $250,000. For the wire fraud counts, the defendants face a maximum period of imprisonment of 20 years and a maximum fine of $250,000. For the false statement on loan application charges, the defendants face a maximum period of imprisonment of 30 years and a maximum fine of $1,000,000. Charges in an indictment are merely accusations, and each defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. At the arraignments, trial dates were set for Oct. 13, 2010, for the 10 and four defendant cases before Chief United States District Judge Susan Oki Mollway and United States District Judge J. Michael Seabright, respectively. The case resulted from an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Internal Revenue Service (IRS)—Criminal Investigation Division. The prosecution is being handled by Assistant United States Attorney Clare Connors. For more information, visit http://honolulu.fbi.gov.
About the author
Published
Aug 13, 2010
Checkr Buys Truv To Move Mortgage Verification Beyond Documents

The acquisition adds consumer-permissioned payroll and banking data to Checkr’s mortgage platform while lenders confront increasingly convincing fabricated financial records

Aug 19, 2026
IMBs Make Most Mortgages. CHLA Says It’s Time They Got FHLBank Access.

As FHFA moves to give Federal Home Loan Banks more flexibility, the trade group is renewing its push to give qualified independent mortgage banks access to FHLBank membership and liquidity

Insuring The Risk To Lenders At Closing

Traditional protections like title insurance and closing protection letters may leave lenders exposed to significant settlement, funding, and fraud-related losses

CHLA Uses Trump Mortgage Order To Renew Push For LO Comp Reform

Community lenders want more flexibility over employee compensation, closing-cost estimates, down payment assistance, and federal supervision of smaller IMBs

Servicers Begin Testing Systems Ahead of VA Partial Claim Deadline

VA lenders and servicers have until Nov. 28 to implement the new loss mitigation waterfall and Partial Claim Program

ROAD Act’s Housing Incentive May Be Too Small To Move Supply

Realtor.com finds the median city risks losing only about $84,000, although the policy could carry more weight in supply-starved Northeast and Midwest markets