Financial Stability Board (FSB) Requests Feedback on Residential Underwriting Practices – NMP Skip to main content

Financial Stability Board (FSB) Requests Feedback on Residential Underwriting Practices

Sep 23, 2010

The Financial Stability Board (FSB) has launched a review of residential mortgage underwriting and origination practices. Problems arising from poorly underwritten residential mortgages contributed significantly to the global financial crisis that began in 2007. The review will survey existing practices across the FSB membership, including recent actions taken by national authorities to promote sound practices, and draw internationally applicable lessons. The review will be based on the recommendations made by the Joint Forum in its January 2010 Review of the Differentiated Nature and Scope of Financial Regulation. The Joint Forum focused on two fundamental areas of concern in the residential mortgage market: Poor underwriting practices and the lack of consistent supervisory and regulatory regimes for similar activities and products. A questionnaire to collect information from national authorities has been distributed to FSB members, and the responses will be analysed and discussed by the FSB later this year. The review will be completed and published in early 2011. As part of this review, the FSB is seeking feedback from financial institutions, industry associations, consumer groups and other stakeholders on their experiences regarding residential mortgage underwriting practices, either in a particular country or across several countries. This could include comments on: ►Gaps in regulatory and supervisory oversight; ►Areas where regulations or guidance from different agencies might overlap; ►Current or best practices for measuring a borrower’s ability and willingness to repay; ►How market practices have evolved in recent years; and ►Challenges faced by underwriters or originators that operate in several countries. Feedback should be submitted by Monday, Oct. 2010 to [email protected] under the subject heading “FSB Thematic Peer Review on Mortgage Underwriting Practices.” Individual submissions will not be made public. This is the third FSB thematic peer review in 2010. The first was the review of compensation, completed in March 2010, and the second is the review on risk disclosures, which is currently underway. For more information, visit www.financialstabilityboard.org.
About the author
Published
Sep 23, 2010
FHFA Studies Credit-Report Changes To Cut Mortgage Costs

Pulte’s comments could signal either fewer bureau reports or a portable report borrowers could share among lenders, but FHFA has not clarified which approach it is studying

AI Errors Leave Mortgage Trustee Without Brief In Foreclosure Appeal

Outside counsel’s fabricated citations expose a third-party oversight risk for mortgage servicers, trustees, and investors

Sep 10, 2026
CHLA Wants Ginnie Mae Liquidity Backstop Ready Before Next Crisis

Proposed G-TALF facility could help prevent a servicing cash crunch from constraining FHA, VA, and USDA lending

FHFA Opens VantageScore To All GSE Lenders, Eyes Credit Report Overhaul

Pulte removes 50-lender cap while considering bi-merge and single-bureau reports as additional ways to reduce mortgage costs

Closing Costs: What HUD’s Proposed Rule Will Really Do To The Market

HUD’s proposed rollback of housing protections could deepen barriers for underserved borrowers, shrink the pool of prospective homebuyers, and ultimately cost loan originators business

Aug 27, 2026
MISMO Gives Lenders A New Test For Mortgage AI Vendors

Two certifications move the industry’s FRAME initiative from governance guidance toward product-level validation and implementation

Aug 27, 2026