Skip to main content

Saxon Sued Again for Improper HAMP Usage
Aug 18, 2011

A class action lawsuit has been filed in Federal Court in New York against Saxon Mortgage Services Inc., the Morgan Stanley mortgage servicer division, for failing to fulfill its obligations under the federally-sponsored Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to homeowners in financial distress. The lawsuit is brought on behalf of plaintiffs Ranujoy and Deborah Pandit and a nationwide class of homeowners who sought loan modifications. It asserts claims for breach of contract, and deceptive business practices under New York law , and seeks monetary damages and injunctive relief. The Pandits, who live in Long Island, N.Y., sought a loan modification in October 2008. After giving them a runaround for several months through ill-informed and ill-trained representatives, Saxon Mortgage Services Inc. offered them a trial period with reduced payments. Under the HAMP program, this trial period was to be for three months, at the end of which the loan had to be modified. On numerous occasions, when the plaintiffs inquired about the status of their application, Saxon’s representatives demanded re-submission of essentially the same information and documentation. The Pandits responded to every one of these demands; they sent and re-sent documentation, and completed the same financial package, at least three times. After about a year, Saxon denied their application, but advised them to apply again. The Pandits point out that servicers have significant incentives to avoid modifying the loan under HAMP. Servicer fees depend on the unpaid principal balance; therefore, any reduction in loan amounts in turn reduce the servicer’s fees. The servicers of the loan also retain all late fees, inspection fees and other related delinquency charges.  In April of this year in the Northern District of California Federal Court, Marie Gaudin filed a suit against Saxon Mortgage Services, Gaudin v. Saxon Mortgage Services Inc., claiming that the company uses HAMP to lure customers into making “trial” payments on loans it has no intention of ever permanently modifying. HAMP has been widely viewed as a failure primarily due to the banks and mortgage servicer’s failure to cooperate. As of June 30, 2011, for example, Saxon had used less than 20 percent of these funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), approximately $12.25 million, to subsidize homeowners, the primary intended beneficiaries of HAMP.
Aug 18, 2011
U.S. 2nd Circuit Appeals Court Rules CFPB Constitutional

Decision comes as Supreme Court prepares to review 5th Circuit Court's opposite ruling on the bureau.

Mar 23, 2023
ICE, Black Knight Officially Respond To FTC Bid To Block Merger

Companies say planned sale of Black Knight's Empower LOS resolves any antitrust concerns.

Fed OKs 9th Rate Hike In 12 Months

Boosts federal funds rate by another 25 basis points.

MISMO Seeks Comment On iLAD 2.3.0

The Industry Loan Application Dataset is the standard for exchanging loan application information.

HUD Eliminating Fair Housing Act Rule That Never Took Effect

Department to rescind 2020 rule that court injunction halted.

MISMO Names David Coleman As President

Coleman has more than 25 years of mortgage industry experience.