New GAO Study Takes Aim at Flood Insurance – NMP Skip to main content

New GAO Study Takes Aim at Flood Insurance

Jul 05, 2013

After the devastating effects of Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy over the past few years, coastal regions have been paying closer attention to flood insurance. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has released the findings of a study that focused solely on those individuals who have purchased flood insurance at its various levels. The Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act was extended last July by President Obama to run an additional five years, until 2017, in order to better-provide subsidized rates for insurance holders. From the Act’s Fact Sheet: “The new law encourages Program financial stability by eliminating some artificially low rates and discounts. Most flood insurance rates will now move to reflect full risk, and flood insurance rates will rise on some policies.” The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) umbrellas various programs under one shingle, including the Repetitive Flood Claims, Severe Repetitive Loss Properties, Flood Mitigation Assistance programs. “Rates must be set to cover the average historical loss year, including catastrophic loss years, in accordance with generally accepted actuarial principles,” reads the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act. The Act also called for the establishment of the National Flood Mapping Program, which keeps track of floodplains in order to better provide information to a region’s population. Not surprisingly, those along the Gulf and East coasts have the maximum coverage for flood insurance, clearly in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy. The program itself encompasses around 5.5 million policyholders, who account for around $1.3 trillion against $3.5 billion paid in premiums. Higher-median home prices often indicate a greater reliance on flood insurance, however; a majority of high-price homes purchase insurance that is far greater than their needs. Of interest on the East Coast is the use of beach nourishment, which was once an allowed mitigation technique. No longer permitted under the Flood Insurance Reform Act, homeowners may no longer utilize septic rings, sandbags, gabions and other forms of coastal erosion/flooding preventative measures in order to create a barrier between their homes and rising coastal floodwaters. One of the more interesting aspects of the Act includes the requirement that FEMA reach out to homeowners in regions that fall within the potential flood zone as to mandatory insurance requirements. Senators and House members are also immediately notified as to what regions are immediately within flood zones. While premiums have changed a bit, the change hasn’t affected everyone. Rates have shifted upward a bit for those in higher-income housing, while in other regions, rates have remained largely the same.
About the author
Published
Jul 05, 2013
Insuring The Risk To Lenders At Closing

Traditional protections like title insurance and closing protection letters may leave lenders exposed to significant settlement, funding, and fraud-related losses

CHLA Uses Trump Mortgage Order To Renew Push For LO Comp Reform

Community lenders want more flexibility over employee compensation, closing-cost estimates, down payment assistance, and federal supervision of smaller IMBs

Servicers Begin Testing Systems Ahead of VA Partial Claim Deadline

VA lenders and servicers have until Nov. 28 to implement the new loss mitigation waterfall and Partial Claim Program

ROAD Act’s Housing Incentive May Be Too Small To Move Supply

Realtor.com finds the median city risks losing only about $84,000, although the policy could carry more weight in supply-starved Northeast and Midwest markets

CRA Proposal Could Reshape Bank Lending And Affordable Housing Investment

The OCC and FDIC would put more weight on lending while easing community development requirements for hundreds of banks

Fannie Mae AI Governance Deadline Arrives Aug. 6

Seller/servicers using artificial intelligence in origination or servicing must have formal policies, oversight, and vendor controls in place