Skip to main content

California City Charged With Too-Generous Housing of Employees

Jan 05, 2016
California’s problem with maintaining an inventory of affordable housing options has been complicated by an investigative news report that determined that a municipal government is providing its well-paid officials and employees with tax-free housing and

California’s problem with maintaining an inventory of affordable housing options has been complicated by an investigative news report that determined that a municipal government is providing its well-paid officials and employees with tax-free housing and rents that are far below market values.

According to a story that appeared in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, 23 individuals on the City of Industry’s municipal payroll, including several city council members, are paying $700 or less per month for rent in city-owned housing, regardless of their income or property appraisals. Among those cited in the story was former City Manager Kevin Radecki, who paid $700 a month in rent for a 2,500-square-foot three-bedroom house that was estimated by Zillow to be worth a monthly rental cost of $2,600. Radecki earned more than $320,000 in salary and benefits during 2014.

John Karayan, a tax expert with University of Southern California’s Leventhal School of Accounting, offered the opinion that the city was in error for not reporting the difference between the low rents and the market value rent as income for its employees.

“These aren’t low-income people,” Karayan said. “It’s strange to think that a legitimate government agency would take someone, particularly a city manager, with that kind of income, and say that is a low to moderate income person. It looks like disguised income.”

City Attorney Jamie Casso insisted that the city did not need to report the housing as income because a municipal agency called the Industry Property Management Authority determined the rental fee and the residents assigned to each property. “Arguably, you do not have a taxable event,” Casso said.

Although the Internal Revenue Service declined to comment on the story, City Manager Paul Philips stated that he would seek to change this policy and has already sent eviction notices to five city employees.

“I think it’s in the best interest to the employees, it’s in the best interest to the city to alleviate any concerns or controversy that’s out there,” Philips said. “I don’t think there is any legal conflict, it’s really important to show credibility.”

However, current city council members do not face eviction under Philips’ plan. A most notable example of this exception involves Councilman Abraham Cruz, who is now renting the property that was previously the home to former City Manager Radecki.

About the author
Published
Jan 05, 2016
The Fed Holds Rates Steady

The Fed maintains the federal funds rate between 4.25% and 4.5%

Mar 20, 2025
HUD, Interior to Open Federal Lands

The Trump Administration has taken the first step in making good on the president’s campaign promise.

Mar 18, 2025
Campaign To Relieve Price Pressures

Realtor.com pushes for policies to close 4M-home shortage

Mar 12, 2025
Union Home Mortgage Acquires Nations Reliable Lending

UHM will strengthen its presence in Texas and southwest Ohio with strategic acquisition

Mar 04, 2025
Ideas to Alleviate Insurance Crisis

Think tank explores tax-advantaged savings accounts for homeowners insurance

Feb 27, 2025
UWM Holdings Reports Strong Loan Production

Loan volume soars as independent mortgage brokers drive growth

Feb 26, 2025