Skip to main content

California City Charged With Too-Generous Housing of Employees

Jan 05, 2016
California’s problem with maintaining an inventory of affordable housing options has been complicated by an investigative news report that determined that a municipal government is providing its well-paid officials and employees with tax-free housing and

California’s problem with maintaining an inventory of affordable housing options has been complicated by an investigative news report that determined that a municipal government is providing its well-paid officials and employees with tax-free housing and rents that are far below market values.

According to a story that appeared in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, 23 individuals on the City of Industry’s municipal payroll, including several city council members, are paying $700 or less per month for rent in city-owned housing, regardless of their income or property appraisals. Among those cited in the story was former City Manager Kevin Radecki, who paid $700 a month in rent for a 2,500-square-foot three-bedroom house that was estimated by Zillow to be worth a monthly rental cost of $2,600. Radecki earned more than $320,000 in salary and benefits during 2014.

John Karayan, a tax expert with University of Southern California’s Leventhal School of Accounting, offered the opinion that the city was in error for not reporting the difference between the low rents and the market value rent as income for its employees.

“These aren’t low-income people,” Karayan said. “It’s strange to think that a legitimate government agency would take someone, particularly a city manager, with that kind of income, and say that is a low to moderate income person. It looks like disguised income.”

City Attorney Jamie Casso insisted that the city did not need to report the housing as income because a municipal agency called the Industry Property Management Authority determined the rental fee and the residents assigned to each property. “Arguably, you do not have a taxable event,” Casso said.

Although the Internal Revenue Service declined to comment on the story, City Manager Paul Philips stated that he would seek to change this policy and has already sent eviction notices to five city employees.

“I think it’s in the best interest to the employees, it’s in the best interest to the city to alleviate any concerns or controversy that’s out there,” Philips said. “I don’t think there is any legal conflict, it’s really important to show credibility.”

However, current city council members do not face eviction under Philips’ plan. A most notable example of this exception involves Councilman Abraham Cruz, who is now renting the property that was previously the home to former City Manager Radecki.

About the author
Published
Jan 05, 2016
More Questions Than Answers At Housing Finance Climate Summit

Government officials, housing leaders, and climate scientists meet to address climate change's escalating impact on housing.

Apr 22, 2024
Maximum Acceleration, Originator Connect Network Sign Exclusive CE Agreement

Pact gives OCN guaranteed live CE at shows, creates nationwide opportunity for Maximum Acceleration

Apr 17, 2024
CMG Acquires Norcom Mortgage's Retail Side

The 25-branch addition will enhance CMG’s northeastern presence from Maryland to Maine.

Apr 12, 2024
CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

NEXA Begins Search For New CFO

NEXA CEO retires the president position after Mat Grella's termination.

Apr 01, 2024
Co-Founder Mat Grella Terminated From NEXA

NEXA CEO Kortas states negotiations regarding the buyout will continue.

Mar 27, 2024