Skip to main content

Study: Bias Persists in Lower Hudson Valley Mortgage Market

May 06, 2016
Discrimination based on race and other factors continues to be a problem among mortgage lenders in New York’s Lower Hudson Valley

Discrimination based on race and other factors continues to be a problem among mortgage lenders in New York’s Lower Hudson Valley, according to a new report issued by the non-profit Westchester Residential Opportunities (WRO).

The report, which was investigations funded by grants from the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD), was based 50 tests conducted in 2013 and 2014 at the branches of major mortgage lenders in 31 predominantly white communities across Westchester and Rockland Counties. Two sets of testers, one white and one non-white, were sent to the same lenders.

The test results determined that in 46 percent of the cases, "disparate treatment on the basis of race, national origin, disability or familial status." Twenty-three cases resulted in disparate race-based treatment, with borrowers being given different loan terms and conditions.

"We're very concerned that there's very limited affordable and accessible housing in Westchester," said Marlene Zarfes, WRO’s fair-housing director. "By doing this study, what we're seeing is (that) discrimination still exists among many protected classes including race, familial status—which means people with children—disability and source of income."

However, the report did not identify which lenders allegedly discriminated against the WRO testers. The anonymity factor was condemned by a regional housing advocacy leader.

"The WRO report is evidence of pernicious discrimination in some of the most 'liberal' communities which are in the county of Westchester but in the state of denial," said Alexander Roberts, executive director of Community Housing Innovations in White Plains. "The public also has a right to know the identity of the banks that discriminate. Why are they being protected?"

But Marianne Collins, executive director of the Mortgage Bankers Association of New York, expressed skepticism on the report’s conclusions, noting the regulatory requirements demanded of mortgage professionals and the relatively brief training sessions that WRO offered its testers.

"They work on commission, so they want to make every loan they can possibly make,” she said about the lenders. “There would be no reason to turn someone down that was deserving of a loan.”

About the author
Published
May 06, 2016
CoreLogic Chief Economist On Witnessing The Insurance Crisis Firsthand

"I could have lost all my equity,” says Selma Hepp, who lives and works on the frontline of housing's biggest challenge in 2025

Jan 20, 2025
Bill Pulte Trump’s Pick For FHFA Director

The founder and CEO of private equity firm, Pulte Capital Partners, LLC, will oversee plans to end GSE conservatorship

Jan 17, 2025
How To Help Borrowers Spot Red Flags Of Mortgage Fraud

Nine years after a foreclosure relief scam unfolded, the FTC is releasing seized funds. Lessons for LOs abound in how it all went down.

L.A. Wildfires Worsen California Insurance Crisis

Home insurers nowhere to be found during "one of the worst wildfire incidents on record”

Jan 13, 2025
FHFA Director Sandra Thompson To Resign On Eve Of Trump Inauguration

Thompson’s departure clears the way for Trump appointee to take over

Jan 10, 2025
CFPB Accuses Experian Of 'Sham' Consumer Dispute Investigations

The alleged conduct results in errors remaining on consumer reports, and errors being reinserted even after resolution

Jan 07, 2025