Skip to main content

Supreme Court: Cities Can Sue Lenders on Predatory Lending

May 01, 2017
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 5-3 ruling that said cities can sue financial institutions for predatory lending practices aimed at non-white borrowers that result in foreclosures, declines in property taxes and dips in property values

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 5-3 ruling that said cities can sue financial institutions for predatory lending practices aimed at non-white borrowers that result in foreclosures, declines in property taxes and dips in property values.
 
According to a Reuters report, the high court’s decision affirms the approach taken by Miami and other cities that attempted to use the Fair Housing Act to hold banks accountable for lending practices that resulted in the increase of foreclosures during the last decade. Three conservative members of the court—Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Anthony Kennedy—dissented from this ruling.
 
However, the court gave an 8-0 ruling that threw out an appellate ruling in Miami’s favor and asked the lower court to revisit the city’s lawsuit against Wells Fargo and Bank of America to determine whether there was a direct link between the banks’ lending practices and the city’s losses. Newly appointed Justice Neil Gorsuch abstained from participating in both rulings.

 
About the author
Published
May 01, 2017
Economists Less Confident Rates Will Drop Following Fed Decision

After sixth consecutive month with no change, the likelihood of cuts in 2024 feels "more out of reach."

FHFA Final Rule Released

Rule codifies equitable housing programs, GSE Plans

FDIC Announces Closure Of Republic First Bank

The Philadelphia-based lender's 32 branches will now be served by Fulton Bank

Mortgage Servicers Added To Junk-Fee Naughty List

New release from CFPB lays out areas of improvement, and concern, for mortgage servicers.

In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.