NAMB Pushes Trigger Lead Ban – NMP Skip to main content

NAMB Pushes Trigger Lead Ban

Feb 21, 2018
NAMB has announced that it will host a full-day seminar on Jan. 16 in San Diego for mortgage professionals who are seeking to be approved for the organization’s newest certification, the Certified Veterans Loan Specialist

National Association of Mortgage Brokers (NAMB) has announced that it is seeking to ban the sale of trigger leads by urging Congress to add appropriate legislative language to Bills HR 4028 and S 1982 (also known as the Protect Act of 2017, Congressional legislative action relating to the recent credit bureau data leak of over 143 million Americans).
 
Mortgage trigger leads are created and sold by the national credit bureaus. These leads are comprised of names, contact information and other data, including a significant amount of personal information, for individuals who have recently applied for a mortgage.
 
“The credit bureaus compile trigger lists daily and sell them to numerous buyers across the U.S., including so-called ‘lead generators,’ who then resell the list to even more companies,” said NAMB President John G. Stevens.
 
At this time, mortgage brokers are unable to prevent credit reporting agencies from including their borrowers' personal information on the trigger lead lists they sell.
 
“Trigger leads impose danger to consumers in several ways,” said Stevens. “First, they expose borrowers to identity theft and increase the risk of compromising borrowers’ financial passwords. They also increase the borrower’s exposure to potentially unfair and deceptive activity by unscrupulous mortgage originators looking to impinge on another mortgage professional’s client.”
 
Contacting consumers for the express purpose of encroaching on an in-process transaction can be harmful and confusing during the complex process of obtaining a mortgage, Stevens explained.
 
“Unfortunately, there are people who use all kinds of unethical tactics to target borrowers who have initiated the process of obtaining a mortgage,” said Stevens. “This activity should be classified as an unfair and deceptive trade practice and banned, with the only exception being those that have an ownership interest in the current mortgage for portfolio retention purposes. The only way to protect the consumer is to close this loop hole immediately, and that’s what NAMB is seeking to accomplish.”

 
About the author
Published
Feb 21, 2018
What The 2026 Election Means For Mortgage Professionals

CHLA’s Scott Olson examines how the next Congress could reshape housing tax breaks, lending costs, and access to homeownership — and where bipartisan deals remain possible

Oct 22, 2026
Servicer Takes New York Payment-Fee Fight To Federal Court

Onity Group says the state hasn’t clearly defined how fees for optional expedited payments must relate to the cost of providing the service

January’s Condo Reserve Increase Puts Project Budgets In Focus

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s higher allocation requirement gives LOs reason to review association finances now, while California’s new funding duties begin in 2032

California Probes Lenders Over Delayed Wildfire Insurance Payouts

State regulators are examining access to rebuilding funds, while CalHFA offers financing tools for eligible disaster survivors

One In Three Americans Blame Lenders For Housing Crisis Ahead Of Midterms

Voters want lower taxes, insurance costs, and mortgage rates, but 63% doubt the election will improve housing

Oct 20, 2026