Ex-NASA Employee, Husband Convicted In Mortgage Fraud Scheme – NMP Skip to main content

Ex-NASA Employee, Husband Convicted In Mortgage Fraud Scheme

Sep 15, 2025
Legal Proceedings Court Case

How LOs can avoid fraud red flags in a climate of increasing scrutiny

A Missouri City, Texas couple — one a former NASA technical manager, the other a NASA contractor — have admitted to orchestrating a fraudulent mortgage financing and refinancing scheme that stretched across several years, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas.

Noreen Khan, 52, and her husband Christopher Mayberry, 53, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy for making false statements to loan businesses tied to multiple mortgages they financed between 2017 and 2021. Prosecutors said the couple provided lenders with fabricated pay stubs, tax forms, and bank account statements to secure and refinance loans on their luxury home.

Court documents show the pair initially took out large personal loans to buy the property in 2016, before quickly defaulting. When creditors pursued repayment, Khan falsely claimed identity theft — filing a fake police report, submitting a false complaint to the Federal Trade Commission, and sending misleading letters to credit bureaus.

Despite those defaults, the couple went on to sign three separate mortgage agreements, repeatedly misrepresenting their employment and income in order to qualify.

Consequences

Khan and Mayberry now face up to five years in federal prison and fines of up to $250,000. They must also pay $276,709 in restitution before their sentencing, scheduled for Dec. 18 before U.S. District Judge Charles Eskridge. Prosecutors noted that NASA’s Office of Inspector General conducted the investigation, underscoring the seriousness of the case.

Why It Matters For LOs And Brokers

Mortgage fraud schemes remain relatively rare, but the risks to lenders — and the professionals who touch those files — are real. 

For loan officers and brokers, the case is a reminder that regulators and investors are watching closely, and fraudulent documentation can slip through if guardrails aren’t followed.

Red Flags To Watch For

  • Inconsistent or unverifiable income records: Documents that don’t align with IRS or third-party verification.
  • Unusual borrower behavior: Aggressively disputing debts or claiming identity theft without credible evidence.
  • Multiple financing attempts: Repeat refinances or applications on the same property within a short span.
  • High-value property paired with shaky documentation: A mismatch between luxury home purchases and financial profile.

What’s Next

Sentencing is set for Dec. 18. Beyond this individual case, brokers and LOs should expect continued vigilance from federal investigators, especially as affordability strains tempt some borrowers to cut corners. 

Staying alert to red flags not only protects lenders, but also safeguards the long-term trust that underpins the mortgage industry.

About the author
Published
Sep 15, 2025
More from
Courts
Two Harbors Responds To UWM Lawsuit; Ishbia Reassures Brokers

Two Harbors disputes UWM’s claims and questions its $603.2 million derivatives loss, while Ishbia says the wholesale lender has never been stronger

Aug 12, 2026
UWM Seeks More Than $500M From Two Harbors After Failed Deal

Lender alleges Two Harbors undermined their merger and steered the company toward CrossCountry, turning a costly acquisition failure into a federal court fight

Aug 10, 2026
UWM Previews Bid To Dismiss Rocket’s $100M Servicing Lawsuit

UWM argues Refi75 was permissible mass advertising

Jul 27, 2026
Kortas Secures Sole Ownership Of NEXA Lending

The settlement ends a multiyear legal battle between the co-founders of NEXA Lending

Jul 20, 2026
OneTrust Sues EMC, UWM, Former Employees Over Alleged Loan Diversion Scheme

The complaint alleges former employees secretly funneled borrower information and loan opportunities to EMC and UWM

Jun 15, 2026
UWM Held In Contempt As Judge Again Orders Ishbia Deposition In ‘All-In’ Case

Court says lender failed to comply with prior discovery order, imposes attorney-fee sanctions

Jun 10, 2026