Fidelity National Financial To Pay N.Y. $3.5M, End ‘No-Poach’ Deals – NMP Skip to main content

Fidelity National Financial To Pay N.Y. $3.5M, End ‘No-Poach’ Deals

Mar 29, 2023
New York State

N.Y. attorney general says such deals illegally stifle competition and reduce wages.

Fidelity National Financial Inc., the nation’s largest title insurance company, will pay $3.5 million to the state of New York under an agreement to end “no-poach” agreements it had with its competitors.

New York Attorney General Letitia James said Wednesday the agreement was the result of an investigation by her office that discovered that Fidelity and its competitors entered into the illegal agreements, under which the companies would not solicit each other’s employees. James said the illegal arrangements reduced competition, wages, and opportunities for workers. 

She said Fidelity agreed to terminate any existing no-poach agreements, pay the state $3.5 million, and cooperate with her office’s ongoing investigations into the industry.  

“New York has always been a place for individuals to achieve their dreams, but when companies illegally collude to deny workers the opportunity to pursue better jobs, they hamper those dreams,” James said. “New Yorkers deserve fair pay for their hard work and experience in their fields, and their career growth should never be threatened by a company’s desire to save money on wages. My office will continue standing up for workers’ rights by stopping no-poach agreements and holding companies accountable for their bad actions.”  

Fidelity issues title insurance policies either directly through its own agency or through independent title insurance agencies. 

Direct agents and independent agencies are competitors in the labor market, and should be able to compete for employees on the basis of salaries, benefits, and career opportunities, James said, adding that Fidelity’s no-poach policies with other companies prevented that from happening. 

The agreement with Fidelity continues James’ efforts to stop unlawful no-poach agreements. In February, her office stopped Affordable Senior Care from preventing patients and their caregivers from choosing the provider of their choice, building on a December 2022 agreement with Marks Homecare Agency over the same issue. 

Also in December 2022, James ended the use of no-poach agreements by Stewart Title Guaranty Corp., one of the largest underwriters of title insurance in the country. Her office also ended no-poach agreements in July 2022 by two other top title insurance companies, AmTrust and First Nationwide, and in September 2021, ended no-poach agreements by another top national title insurer, Old Republic National Title.

About the author
David Krechevsky was an editor at NMP.
Published
Mar 29, 2023
CFPB Weighs Changes To TRID Timing And Mortgage Rescission Rules

The bureau is seeking feedback on whether federal disclosure requirements raise costs, delay closings or limit access to mortgage credit

CFPB Issues AI Underwriting Guidance On Adverse Action Notices

The agency says proprietary and machine-learning models do not relieve lenders of their fair lending and disclosure responsibilities

VantageScore Says 4.0 Model Could Unlock $1 Trillion In Mortgage Originations

New study says VantageScore 4.0 scores five million more creditworthy borrowers than FICO Score 10T, expanding lending opportunities as the industry prepares for the GSE credit score transition

MISMO Updates Mortgage Insurance Standards To Support FICO 10T, VantageScore 4.0

New implementation guide standardizes mortgage insurance data exchange, helping lenders, insurers and technology providers prepare systems for newer credit scoring models

Congress Weighs New Roadmap To End Fannie, Freddie Conservatorship

Rep. Scott Fitzgerald's three-bill housing package would establish a statutory framework for releasing the GSEs while expanding construction lending and easing some TRID compliance requirements

CHLA Backs Bank Capital Proposal, Questions Impact On Mortgage Lending

Trade group supports lower mortgage risk weights but says broader market forces — not capital rules — drove banks' retreat from the market