HUD and Alaska’s Division of Insurance settle with title company on RESPA kickback violations – NMP Skip to main content

HUD and Alaska’s Division of Insurance settle with title company on RESPA kickback violations

Jan 13, 2010

The U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) and the State of Alaska’s Division of Insurance ( Alaska DOI ) have announced a legal settlement with Alyeska Title Guaranty Agency for alleged violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and Alaska’s anti-rebating law. HUD and Alaska DOI claim Alyeska paid a sham employee for referring consumers to the title company. Under the terms of the settlement announced, the company agrees to cease the alleged sham employment arrangement and will pay up to $155,000 to the U.S. government and the State of Alaska. “Consumers are the ones who ultimately foot the bill from unethical practices in mortgage transactions,” said David H. Stevens, HUD’s Assistant Secretary for Housing and Federal Housing Commissioner. “Working closely with our partners in Alaska, we hope this settlement will send a clear message that we have zero tolerance for unethical behavior in mortgage lending.” Linda Hall, Director of the Alaska Division of Insurance said, “This action should serve as a warning that we expect strict adherence to both RESPA provisions and Alaska insurance statutes and regulations by those involved in the title insurance and real estate industry.” After a joint investigation, HUD and Alaska DOI alleged that since at least 2003, Alyeska maintained a sham employment arrangement with Kirk Wickersham, owner of FSBO System Inc. HUD and Alaska DOI allege Wickersham, as a “title marketer,” was paid a percentage of Alyeska’s title insurance premiums in exchange for referrals he made to Alyeska. Section 8 of RESPA prohibits a person from giving or accepting anything of value in exchange for the referral of settlement service business. RESPA also prohibits a person from giving or accepting any part of a charge for services that are not performed. Likewise, the State of Alaska’s anti-rebating statute ( AS § 21.66.310 ) prohibits title companies and their agents from giving anything of value, directly or indirectly, as an inducement to obtaining title insurance business. In addition, state law prohibits a person in the real estate services industry, or any other person, from receiving, directly or indirectly, any rebate, reduction, or a special favor or advantage, or a monetary consideration or inducement. For more information, visit www.hud.gov.
About the author
Published
Jan 13, 2010
FHA Sets Jan. 1 Start For FICO 10T And VantageScore 4.0

Lenders will gain competing modern scoring options, but borrowers may not see both offered everywhere

Sep 11, 2026
FHFA Studies Credit-Report Changes To Cut Mortgage Costs

Pulte’s comments could signal either fewer bureau reports or a portable report borrowers could share among lenders, but FHFA has not clarified which approach it is studying

AI Errors Leave Mortgage Trustee Without Brief In Foreclosure Appeal

Outside counsel’s fabricated citations expose a third-party oversight risk for mortgage servicers, trustees, and investors

Sep 10, 2026
CHLA Wants Ginnie Mae Liquidity Backstop Ready Before Next Crisis

Proposed G-TALF facility could help prevent a servicing cash crunch from constraining FHA, VA, and USDA lending

FHFA Opens VantageScore To All GSE Lenders, Eyes Credit Report Overhaul

Pulte removes 50-lender cap while considering bi-merge and single-bureau reports as additional ways to reduce mortgage costs

Closing Costs: What HUD’s Proposed Rule Will Really Do To The Market

HUD’s proposed rollback of housing protections could deepen barriers for underserved borrowers, shrink the pool of prospective homebuyers, and ultimately cost loan originators business

Aug 27, 2026