HUD charges Chicago real estate group for violation of the Fair Housing Act – NMP Skip to main content

HUD charges Chicago real estate group for violation of the Fair Housing Act

Aug 11, 2010

The U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) has announced that it is charging a Chicago couple, their real estate agent, and a real estate broker with refusing to sell a home listed for $1.799 million to a black couple because of their race, in violation of the Fair Housing Act. The charge alleges that owners Daniel and Adrienne Sabbia and real estate agent Jeffrey Lowe stalled negotiations and took the property off the market after receiving a $1.7 million offer from radio personality and comedian George Willborn and his wife, businesswoman Peytyn Willborn. The Willborns submitted the highest offer the sellers had received in the two years the property was on the market. Yet, when faced with the sales contract, the Sabbias refused to sign it. Real estate agent Jeffrey Lowe told HUD investigators that Daniel Sabbia expressed a preference not to sell his home to an African-American. The charge also names the Lowe Group Chicago Inc. and real estate broker, Prudential Rubloff Properties. “Racial fairness is important at all income levels. Civil rights enforcement must be the effective shield against housing discrimination that in this case wealth was not,” said John Trasviña, HUD Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. The Fair Housing Act prohibits housing discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status and disability. This includes the selling, brokering or appraising of a real estate property. HUD’s action is also on behalf of the prospective buyers’ real estate agent who was effectively denied a commission by the alleged discriminatory action of the sellers.   The HUD charge will be heard by an Administrative Law Judge unless any party to the charge elects to have the case heard in federal district court. If an administrative law judge finds after a hearing that discrimination has occurred, he may award damages to aggrieved persons for the damages caused them by the discrimination. The judge may also order injunctive relief and other equitable relief to deter further discrimination, as well as payment of attorney fees. In addition, the judge may impose fines in order to vindicate the public interest. If the matter is decided in federal court, the judge may also award punitive damages to aggrieved persons. For more information, visit www.hud.gov.
About the author
Published
Aug 11, 2010
Jobs Report Comes In Weak After Mortgage Rates Surge

Employers added just 29,000 jobs in September, sending Treasury yields lower and offering a potential counterweight to the recent rise in mortgage rates

Oct 02, 2026
Price Cuts Hit Four-Year High As Mortgage Rates Top 7%

More than one in five listings took a price cut in September, but pending sales still posted their sharpest annual decline since March 2025

Oct 01, 2026
Serious Mortgage Delinquencies Rise 19% After Five Months Of Improvement

ICE data shows 574,000 mortgages were at least 90 days past due in August, while early-stage delinquencies remained below year-ago levels

Sep 29, 2026
Smaller Down Payments Give Buyers More Room, But Rates Limit The Savings

The typical down payment fell 9% from a year ago, while shifting market conditions are giving originators different affordability conversations across the country

Sep 25, 2026
Mortgage Rates Break 7% Just As Builders Find A Way To Move Buyers

New-home sales rose 6.4% in August as builders cut prices, offered incentives, and sold more lower-priced homes. Now mortgage rates are moving against buyers again

Sep 25, 2026
Borrowers Want Digital Closings, But Some Originators Remain Hesitant

ServiceLink finds 45% of surveyed LOs cite borrower reluctance as a barrier, even though most recent buyers say digital options would influence their choice of mortgage provider

Sep 23, 2026