Skip to main content

Maryland originator and modular home provider indicted in mortgage scheme

Aug 26, 2010

A federal grand jury in Baltimore indicted John Stewart Morrison IV of Columbia, Md., on two counts of mail fraud and indicted Clifford Michael Seibert of Berlin, Md., and Seibert’s company, Modular Homes Wholesaler Inc. on two counts of wire fraud in connection with a mortgage fraud scheme. Each indictment also seeks the forfeiture of the proceeds of the scheme, alleged to be $431,317 for Morrison and $363,808 for Seibert. The indictments were announced by United States Attorney for the District of Maryland Rod J. Rosenstein; Special Agent in Charge Richard A. McFeely of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); and Special Agent in Charge Ken Taylor of the Housing and Urban Development Office of Inspector General—Office of Investigations. According to their indictments, Morrison was a mortgage originator and Seibert owned and operated Modular Homes Wholesaler Inc., located in Berlin, Md. Modular Homes arranged the construction and delivery of pre-fabricated modular homes. According to Morrison’s indictment, on Nov. 17, 2005 Morrison contracted to buy Lot #1, Rexwood Drive in Glen Rock Borough, Pa. from the original owner which disclosed to Morrison at least two documents detailing significant problems with the steeply graded parcel of land. In order for a home to be built on Lot #1, extensive soil and engineering work had to be done. The indictment alleges that Morrison failed to follow through on his purchase of Lot #1 and instead recruited P.H., who wanted to have a modular home installed on the site, to purchase the lot. Morrison allegedly failed to disclose the problems with the lot to P.H. The indictment alleges that Morrison and another individual prepared a loan package in P.H.’s name to apply for a loan from a mortgage lender in the amount of $431,377, to finance the purchase of Lot #1 and construction of a home on the land. The package falsely represented P.H.’s monthly income. Morrison allegedly failed to disclose the problems with Lot #1 to the appraiser, thereby causing the lender to rely on a materially deficient appraisal. Still believing that the land could be built-upon without additional preparatory work, P.H. paid $115,500 for the purchase of the lot at the closing held on June 14, 2006. Morrison allegedly received $36,800 as a result of P.H.’s purchase, which amount was actually paid to the “Atlantic Group,” an entity that Morrison created and used to ensure that his name did not appear on the closing documents. According to Seibert’s indictment, he arranged for the construction and delivery of a modular home to Lot #1 on P.H.’s behalf. Seibert prepared a draw schedule in which the lender was to pay Modular Homes a percentage of the loan funds as various stages of completion were reached in the construction and delivery of P.H.’s home. Seibert listed the total price of all services related to the modular home as $363,808. After the closing, the title company mailed a check to Seibert for $35,380 payable to Modular Homes, in accordance with the draw schedule, to begin work on P.H.’s project, including preparing the lot for construction and delivery of the home. The indictment alleges that Seibert did little work, if any, on P.H.’s behalf during this time. The indictment alleges that on or about Aug. 7, 2006, Seibert requested that funds from the construction escrow account be wired directly to Modular Homes, rather than to P.H. Shortly thereafter, in order to persuade the lender to exempt him from the company’s general policy of paying for construction work only after receiving proof of an approved building permit, Seibert is alleged to have falsely advised the lender that Glen Rock Borough would not issue a building permit until after the foundation for the home was poured. Soon thereafter, in early August 2006, Seibert allegedly submitted his first draw request which falsely represented that the clearing and filling of the lot was complete, when in fact, no work had been done. Seibert then falsely advised the lender that the construction project had overrun in costs because the lot’s community development association was demanding that substantial engineering work be done. The indictment alleges that on Aug. 30, 2006. Seibert requested an advance payment of $18,575 for additional costs that would be incurred to meet the demands of the lot’s community development association, when in fact, the development association had made no such demands. Seibert’s request resulted in the lender agreeing in late October 2006 to fund $16,675 of this request. Morrison and Seibert each face a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison on each of two counts of mail fraud and wire fraud, respectively. Morrison was arrested today and had an initial appearance in U.S. District Court in Baltimore. An indictment is not a finding of guilt. An individual charged by indictment is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty at some later criminal proceedings. The Maryland Mortgage Fraud Task Force was established to unify the agencies that regulate and investigate mortgage fraud and promote the early detection, identification, prevention, and prosecution of mortgage fraud schemes. This case, as well as other cases brought by members of the Task Force, demonstrates the commitment of law enforcement agencies to protect consumers from fraud and promote the integrity of the credit markets. For more information, visit http://baltimore.fbi.gov.
About the author
Published
Aug 26, 2010
In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."

Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Banning NTRAPS

The new law prohibits the recording of NTRAPS in property records, creates penalties if NTRAPS are recorded, and provides for the removal of NTRAPS currently in place.