Skip to main content

FTC Fines and Bans Six for Foreclosure Relief Violations

Dec 21, 2011

Six defendants have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charges that they participated in a fraudulent mortgage modification and foreclosure relief scheme. The settlement orders require five defendants to pay back millions in ill-gotten gains, and permanently ban all six from selling any mortgage assistance or debt relief products. The settlements with the U.S. Homeowners Relief defendants are part of the agency’s ongoing crackdown on frauds targeting consumers in financial distress. According to the complaint filed last year by the FTC, the defendants touted a “Government Mortgage Relief Program” that would supposedly reduce mortgage payments as part of the “Obama Act” or the “federal stimulus program,” even though the defendants had no affiliation with the government. Claiming a 90 percent or higher success rate, they charged consumers up to $4,250 and promised to reduce their mortgage payments, their interest rates, and sometimes even their principal loan amounts. The FTC also alleged that although the defendants promised full refunds if they were unsuccessful, once consumers paid the fee, they received nothing, did not get refunds, and the defendants did not respond to their calls or e-mails. According to the complaint, the defendants disconnected their telephones and changed the name of their business while continuing to make promises and take money from other consumers. The defendants claimed to have established relationships with lenders that enabled them to obtain loan modifications on favorable terms, according to the FTC complaint. In mailers that appeared to be tailored to individual recipients, the defendants allegedly led consumers to believe that they could receive a loan modification by stating that the consumers had been “PRE-SELECTED” because their loan situation met the defendants’ criteria, and by actually specifying the consumers’ new 30-year fixed payment. The settlement order against Aminullah Sarpas and New Life Solutions Inc. imposes a $3.9 million judgment; the order against Damon Grant Carriger, DLD Consulting LLC, and D.G.C. Consulting Inc. imposes a judgment of $2.1 million. The settlement order against Macie Majeco Bain imposes a $3.6 million judgment that is suspended. All six defendants are banned from providing debt relief and mortgage assistance services, prohibited from making misrepresentations about other products and services, required to back up any claims they make about the benefits, performance, and efficacy of financial products, and required to comply with the Telemarketing Sales Rule. Litigation continues against Paul Bain, and defaulting corporate defendants U.S. Homeowners Relief Inc., Waypoint Law Group Inc., and American Lending Review Inc.
About the author
Published
Dec 21, 2011
Six Mortgage Brokerages Sued Over Alleged Kickback Scheme

Pennsylvania AG claims up to $1M swapped hands between agents and brokers

Jan 24, 2025
Rocket Wins $10 Million Dismissal In Decade-Old Class Action

"An injury in law is not an injury in fact," the Fourth Circuit ruled in reversing class certification

Jan 24, 2025
CFPB Medical Debt Rule Could See Delay, Reconsideration

President Trump orders agencies to potentially reopen comments on new rules

Treliant Names Andrew Surgan Managing Director

Surgan to help clients mitigate regulatory risk and streamline compliance in 'uncertain environment'

Jan 21, 2025
Equifax Paying $15 Million For Consumer Dispute Failures

The CFPB filed a lawsuit against fellow credit-giant Experian two weeks ago alleging the same

New Maryland Licensing Regs Spark Funding Uncertainty

Actions taken this week require all secondary market investors to be NMLS licensed in the state