Texan Found Guilty in $1.6 Million Foreclosure Rescue Scam – NMP Skip to main content

Texan Found Guilty in $1.6 Million Foreclosure Rescue Scam

Jan 12, 2012

Frederic Alan Gladle of Austin, Texas has pled guilty in the Western District of Texas for his role in operating a foreclosure rescue scam in Southern California and elsewhere that charged distressed homeowners fees in exchange for fraudulently postponing foreclosure sales. The guilty plea was announced by Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney Andre Birotte Jr. of the Central District of California, U.S. Attorney Robert Pitman of the Western District of Texas, Assistant Director in Charge Steven Martinez of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office and Christy Romero, Deputy Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP). Gladle was charged in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles with one count of bankruptcy fraud and one count of aggravated identity theft. Gladle admitted that beginning in October 2007 and continuing for a four-year span until October 2011, he operated a foreclosure rescue fraud scheme that netted him more than $1.6 million in fees from distressed homeowners. According to court documents, Gladle used five aliases to avoid detection, including stealing the identity of at least one person and setting up a mobile phone account in that victim’s name. Gladle admitted that he recruited homeowners whose properties were in danger of imminent foreclosure and falsely promised to delay the foreclosures for up to six months, in exchange for a fee of approximately $750 per month. Gladle, directly or through salespersons, directed homeowners to sign deeds granting fractional interest in their properties to debtors in bankruptcy proceedings whose names Gladle found by searching bankruptcy records. The debtors were unaware that their names and bankruptcy cases were being used by Gladle in his scheme. Gladle then sent the unsuspecting debtors’ bankruptcy petitions, and the deeds that transferred fractional interests to the debtors, to the homeowners’ lenders to stop foreclosure proceedings. Because bankruptcy filings give rise to automatic stays that protect debtors’ properties, the receipt of the bankruptcy petitions and deeds in the debtors’ names forced lenders to cancel foreclosure sales. The lenders, which included banks who received government funds under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), could not move forward to collect money that was owed to them until getting permission from the bankruptcy courts, thereby repeatedly delaying the lenders’ recovery of their money. When homeowners wanted to void the deeds to the unsuspecting debtors, Gladle would forge the debtors’ signatures on papers voiding the deeds.
About the author
Published
Jan 12, 2012
Vought To Face Congress Over CFPB Overhaul, Enforcement Pullback

Vought’s testimony also comes as a new poll suggests the CFPB retains broad support across party lines

Illinois Changes Property Tax Foreclosure Process To Return Surplus Equity

Borrowers can save remaining home equity after delinquent property taxes and fees are paid

CFPB Weighs Changes To TRID Timing And Mortgage Rescission Rules

The bureau is seeking feedback on whether federal disclosure requirements raise costs, delay closings or limit access to mortgage credit

CFPB Issues AI Underwriting Guidance On Adverse Action Notices

The agency says proprietary and machine-learning models do not relieve lenders of their fair lending and disclosure responsibilities

VantageScore Says 4.0 Model Could Unlock $1 Trillion In Mortgage Originations

New study says VantageScore 4.0 scores five million more creditworthy borrowers than FICO Score 10T, expanding lending opportunities as the industry prepares for the GSE credit score transition

MISMO Updates Mortgage Insurance Standards To Support FICO 10T, VantageScore 4.0

New implementation guide standardizes mortgage insurance data exchange, helping lenders, insurers and technology providers prepare systems for newer credit scoring models