Missing Docs Account for 40 Percent of QC Issues – NMP Skip to main content

Missing Docs Account for 40 Percent of QC Issues

Jan 24, 2012

Interthinx has announced that it has identified two major defects in the outsourced Quality Control (QC) programs of lenders that affected residential mortgage loan files in 2011 and may pose significant risk in 2012. According to Interthinx, 40.9 percent of its QC findings relate to missing documentation or data integrity issues. Eligibility and credit issues account for only 18.3 percent of 2011 findings. “Many in our industry will be surprised to learn that more than 40 percent of our findings last year were related to missing documentation or data integrity issues,” said Connie Wilson, executive vice president of Interthinx. “It’s significant when comparing this recent data to data from 2006 to 2009 when missing documentation only accounted for 7.1 percent of all findings. If lenders are not outsourcing their quality control processes, they should at least consider having someone from the outside take a look at their processes. If a lender’s internal quality control process mimics their internal originations process, the lender could easily miss documentation or data integrity issues.” The QC process provided by Interthinx includes learning how each client does business to assist in identifying critical issues from application to close. Interthinx provides lenders valuable statistics on the individuals who deal with their loans on a daily basis to identify training and process needs and to help lenders gain more confidence about the loans they originate. “If lenders haven’t used outsourced quality control in the past, 2012 may be the year to try it,” said Wilson. “To reduce repurchase requests, most major government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) recommend having an independent source back up internal processes. The shift towards manufacturing defects in 2011 from historical borrower eligibility issues is a significant finding. Today’s borrowers are very well qualified for the most part. However, a well-qualified borrower does not always protect lenders from elevated defect rates or even repurchase issues. The lender’s loan manufacturing process needs to be sound in all areas to avoid potential repurchase. A simple breakdown can leave the lender on the hook for a loan that should have been bulletproof.”
About the author
Published
Jan 24, 2012
Closing Costs: What HUD’s Proposed Rule Will Really Do To The Market

HUD’s proposed rollback of housing protections could deepen barriers for underserved borrowers, shrink the pool of prospective homebuyers, and ultimately cost loan originators business

Aug 27, 2026
MISMO Gives Lenders A New Test For Mortgage AI Vendors

Two certifications move the industry’s FRAME initiative from governance guidance toward product-level validation and implementation

Aug 27, 2026
One Owner, Two GSEs: Would Fannie And Freddie Still Compete?

Oksenholt Capital says shared infrastructure could lower costs without weakening competition, but mortgage bankers have warned that common ownership could reduce lender choice, innovation, and market resilience

Aug 27, 2026
MaxClass: Education Meets Lead Generation

CEO Kelly Hendricks details how MaxClass and HomeQB are opening a new referral channel for originators

Fannie Mae Returns To Distressed-Loan Market With $214 Million Sale

The agency’s first nonperforming-loan offering in 13 months transfers 969 deeply delinquent mortgages to private buyers, including a small pool concentrated in Dallas-Fort Worth

Aug 20, 2026
Brief Refinance Shift Tests Mortgage Lenders’ Compliance Controls

Critical defect rate jumps 23.9% as math-based compliance findings expose the potential for one systemic error to affect loans across a lender’s book