Skip to main content

11 AGs File Brief to Protect Against Discriminatory Housing Practices

Jan 31, 2012

Eleven U.S. state attorneys general have filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the U.S. Supreme Court urging the court in Magner v. Gallagher to rule that federal anti-discrimination law can be enforced in cases where a housing or mortgage policy appears neutral on its surface but has a discriminatory effect. The 11 AGs include Thomas C. Horne of Arizona, Kamala D. Harris of California, George Jepsen of Connecticut, David M. Louie of Hawaii, Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, Gary K. King of New Mexico, Eric T. Schneiderman of New York, Michael DeWine of Ohio, John R. Kroger of Oregon, Mark L. Shurtleff of Utah, and Darrell V. Mcgraw Jr. of West Virginia. "Segregation in housing and barriers to equal opportunity remain a great concern for communities throughout the country," said the amicus brief dated Jan. 30, 2012. "Disparate impact causes of action are needed to respond to contemporary forms of bias and to eliminate practices and policies that perpetuate segregated housing patterns." Magner v. Gallagher involves a policy of the City of St. Paul, Minnesota to remedy "problem properties" by targeting low-income renter-occupied properties for housing code violations, condemnations and evictions. In 2004 and 2005, a group of current and former owners of rental properties challenged the city's policy, contending that these practices had a disproportionate impact on racial and ethnic minorities and, in particular, African-Americans. African-Americans made up 60 to 70 percent of the city's low-income renters, while they made up approximately 12 percent of the population of St. Paul, Minn. "For more than four decades, the Fair Housing Act has been a key tool for rooting out discrimination in housing and residential financing," said California AG Harris. "Minority homeowners and renters in California, who have been disproportionately impacted by the housing and mortgage crisis, deserve access to housing without facing discrimination and other deceptive practices." The plaintiffs challenged the city's policy in federal court under the Fair Housing Act, which is part of the Civil Rights Act of 1968. The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, and financing of dwellings, based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status and disability. In 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that housing policies that disproportionately impact protected groups violate the Fair Housing Act and are subject to disparate-impact scrutiny. The City appealed that decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, which will hear oral arguments in the matter in February 2012.  
About the author
Published
Jan 31, 2012
The New Frontier

In a modern lending landscape, be on high alert to safeguard against appraisal bias

CHLA Urges CFPB To End Trigger Lead "Junk Calls"

CHLA sends another letter urging the CFPB to focus on trigger lead solicitations.

CFPB Orders Freedom Mortgage To Pay $3.95M Over Housing Data Errors

CFPB proposed an order requiring Freedom Mortgage to pay a $3.95 million penalty

CFPB Proposes To Ban Medical Debt From Credit Reports

CFPB expects the rule would allow 22,000 additional mortgages to be approved every year.

Manufacturing Fair Lending

How data defines a modern theory of redlining