Skip to main content

How About Them Fraudsters? Former Cowboy Lockhart Faces 10 Years After Mortgage Fraud Conviction

Feb 20, 2012

Following a nearly five-week jury trial, four co-defendants in a mortgage fraud scheme run by former Dallas Cowboy Eugene J. Lockhart and co-defendant William Randolph Tisdale were convicted on all counts of a superseding indictment charging them with various offenses related to a mortgage fraud scheme in which they participated in the Dallas area from approximately 2002 to 2005. Judge Jorge A. Solis declared a mistrial for defendant Suzette Switzer Hinds of Dallas as the jury could not reach a verdict on her. The remaining defendants charged in the case have pleaded guilty. Each of the following four defendants, all Texas residents, were convicted as follows: ►William Randolph Tisdale Jr. of Dallas, was convicted on one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and one count of bank fraud. ►Hubert Jones III of Garland, Texas was convicted on one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, one count of bank fraud and one count of wire fraud. ►Lendell Beacham of Desoto, Texas, a mortgage company owner, was convicted on one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and one count of wire fraud. ►Scott David Eller of Mansfield, Texas, a CPA, was convicted on one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. The maximum statutory sentence for conspiracy to commit wire fraud is 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The maximum statutory sentence for bank fraud is 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine. The maximum statutory sentence for wire fraud is 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The below-listed defendants pleaded guilty to their respective roles in the fraud: ►Eugene J. Lockhart of Carrollton, Texas, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. If the court accepts the terms of his plea agreement, he faces a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. ►Patricia Ortega Suarez of Dallas, an escrow officer, pleaded guilty to two counts of making a false statement to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD). If the court accepts the terms of her plea agreement, she faces a maximum sentence of 30 months in prison and a $250,000 fine. ►Michael Anthony Caldwell of Arlington, Texas, who was a manager for a title company, pleaded guilty to one count of making a false statement to HUD; he faces a maximum sentence of two years in prison and a $250,000 fine. ►Donna Lois Kneeland of Grand Prairie, Texas, also an escrow officer, pleaded guilty to one count of making a false statement to HUD. She faces a maximum sentence of two years in prison and a $250,000 fine. ►Bryan J. Moorman of Mesquite, Texas, who acted as a real estate appraiser, pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud. If the court accepts the terms of his plea agreement, he faces a maximum sentence of 27 months in prison and a $250,000 fine. ►Jermaine Frederick Frazier of Desoto, Texas who acted as a loan processor and lieutenant for Lockhart, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. If the court accepts the terms of his plea agreement, he faces a maximum sentence of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Restitution may be ordered; sentencing dates will be set later by an order of the court. Lockhart was involved with real estate entities, some formed by him and Tisdale, which had names that were often derived in some fashion from a reference to the Dallas Cowboys, including America’s Team Mortgage; America’s Team Realty; America’s Team Funding Group; Ace Mortgage; Cowboys Realty; Cowboys Mortgage and KLT Properties. Tisdale was involved with Pinnacle Development and Realty Corporation; Atilla Capital Corporation; and KLT Properties. Jones was involved with Pinnacle Development and Realty Corporation and Atilla Capital Corporation. The defendants ran a scheme in which they located single-family residences for sale in the Dallas area, including distressed and pre-foreclosure properties, and negotiated a sales price with the seller. They created surplus loan proceeds by inflating the sales price to an arbitrary amount substantially more than the fair market value of the residence. Generally, they recruited individuals to act as nominee or straw purchasers or straw borrowers, promising to pay them a bonus or commission of between $10,000 and $20,000 for their participation in a particular real estate transaction. The conspirators caused the loan applications for each straw borrower to include false financial information, often including inflated false income figures to conceal the borrower’s true financial condition so that the lender would more likely approve the loan. The conspirators concealed from the lenders the true status, financial condition and intentions of the named borrowers, knowing that loans would not likely be approved if the lender knew the true role, credit worthiness and risk of each straw borrower. The conspirators falsely represented in loan documents that the straw purchaser intended to use the property as their primary residence, intentionally concealing from the lender that each straw borrower viewed himself as an “investor,” who never intended to occupy the home. Some of the conspirators also caused bogus and fraudulent “marketing fees” to be listed on loan closing documents to provide a means for the conspirators to receive surplus/excess loan proceeds. The scope of the conspiracy involved approximately 54 fraudulent residential property loan closings resulting in the funding of approximately $20.5 million in fraudulent loans. The actual loss to lenders is nearly $3 million.
About the author
Published
Feb 20, 2012
TD Bank Pleads Guilty To Enabling Money Laundering For Criminal Organizations

'TD Bank chose profits over compliance in order to keep its costs down,' said U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland.

LoanSnap Officially Loses Connecticut License

The AI mortgage startup formerly faced a cease and desist and a consent order from the State of Connecticut.

Oct 09, 2024
Wishing Regulations Away

What mortgage leaders want to see revised in the wake of Supreme Court undoing of government favoritism

False Moves, Real Consequences

Don’t let missteps mortgage your future

Navigating New Norms

Unpacking changing issues in loan servicing

Congress Fits Trigger Lead Ban Into The 2025 Budget

Senate Amendment 2358, banning 'abusive' trigger leads, was added to the Senate's Fiscal Year 2025 NDAA