Kroll: Lenders Face Risk and Additional Costs to Doing Business – NMP Skip to main content

Kroll: Lenders Face Risk and Additional Costs to Doing Business

May 24, 2012

Kroll Factual Data Inc. has reported that more than 14 percent of the loan files processed by Kroll in 2011, and in the first quarter of 2012, contained certain applicant-provided information that suggested the possibility of fraudulent activity. Using its proprietary risk analysis and verification engines, Kroll Factual Data determined these files triggered alerts that could indicate the presence of mortgage origination fraud, resulting in reputational damage and/or increased costs of doing business for lenders and other mortgage providers. “It is important for mortgage lenders to have the right tools to identify potentially fraudulent activity, thereby enabling them to better understand the actions that can be taken to reduce the risks and costs associated with having to repurchase loans,” said Rod Bazzani, president of Kroll Factual Data. “Our suite of risk solutions provides a market-tested, cost-effective method for mortgage lenders to reduce risk and mitigate the chance of having to incur such costs.” Kroll has developed, and continues to refine, advanced proprietary algorithms—deployed through its risk analysis and verification engines—that assess applicant-provided information for the potential indicators of fraud. These engines are fully customizable, allowing clients to tailor the algorithms to reduce the number of false alerts. For example, after a national lender worked closely with Kroll Factual Data to customize its alert criteria, which included removing alerts for data entry and similar administrative errors, this lender realized a significant decrease in its average alert review rate—from 8.5 percent in 2011, to less than seven percent in Q1 of 2012. Typical fraud alert variables would include a “no match” result (on a Social Security Number verification), a potential “straw buyer,” a positive match against the Office of Foreign Assets Control list, etc. In all, there are more than 300 fraud alert factors that could be flagged for additional review.  “Our goal is to empower financial services companies with the mortgage-related information, processes and risk mitigation tools they need to confidently make decisions to support their business objectives,” said Bazzani. “Our proprietary risk analysis and verification solutions are exactly what mortgage lenders need to thrive in today’s challenging and volatile mortgage lending environment.”
About the author
Published
May 24, 2012
Insuring The Risk To Lenders At Closing

Traditional protections like title insurance and closing protection letters may leave lenders exposed to significant settlement, funding, and fraud-related losses

CHLA Uses Trump Mortgage Order To Renew Push For LO Comp Reform

Community lenders want more flexibility over employee compensation, closing-cost estimates, down payment assistance, and federal supervision of smaller IMBs

Servicers Begin Testing Systems Ahead of VA Partial Claim Deadline

VA lenders and servicers have until Nov. 28 to implement the new loss mitigation waterfall and Partial Claim Program

ROAD Act’s Housing Incentive May Be Too Small To Move Supply

Realtor.com finds the median city risks losing only about $84,000, although the policy could carry more weight in supply-starved Northeast and Midwest markets

CRA Proposal Could Reshape Bank Lending And Affordable Housing Investment

The OCC and FDIC would put more weight on lending while easing community development requirements for hundreds of banks

Fannie Mae AI Governance Deadline Arrives Aug. 6

Seller/servicers using artificial intelligence in origination or servicing must have formal policies, oversight, and vendor controls in place