Skip to main content

Rep. Bachus Questions the Accountability and Transparency of the CFPB

Jun 22, 2012

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Rep. Spencer Bachus, who has introduced legislation approved by the House to place the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) under the leadership of a five-member, bipartisan commission, released the following statement about a lawsuit filed in federal court challenging the constitutionality of the Dodd-Frank Act: “There is no question the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau—by the design of Dodd-Frank Act supporters—lacks accountability and transparency. As it is currently structured, the CFPB is one of the most powerful and least accountable agencies in all of Washington. Everyone supports consumer protection, but everyone should also support real oversight and accountability of massive government bureaucracies, and that includes the CFPB. House Republicans have worked to change the bureau’s structure to make the CFPB more effective, less politicized and more accountable. We’ve approved common sense reforms that in no way diminish the CFPB’s consumer protection mission but do guarantee taxpayers there will be checks and balances on a government bureaucracy that spends hundreds of millions of dollars,” said Rep. Bachus. “A bipartisan commission would help ensure that CFPB rules are balanced, fair and reasonable. It also promotes continuity in rulemaking by preventing a new director from unilaterally reversing the decisions made by a previous director. This is a structure that has worked well for nearly every other regulatory body in this country and will work for the CFPB." The Dodd-Frank Act established the CFPB as an independent bureau within the Federal Reserve. Under Dodd-Frank, the CFPB is run by a single director who has sole authority over the agency’s 1,000-plus government employees and can spend its budget without any oversight. The CFPB director also has the authority to decide which financial products and services will be available to American consumers. The CFPB director’s mandates can be overturned, but only in extremely limited and highly unlikely circumstances by a small council of fellow Presidential appointees—one of whom is the CFPB director. This makes the CFPB unlike any other governmental agency, including those whose responsibilities include protecting consumers. The House passed legislation in July 2011 on a vote of 241-173 to improve the structure of the CFPB. HR 1315, introduced by Rep. Sean Duffy, Chairman Bachus and Rep. Shelley Moore Capito, establishes a five-member, bipartisan commission to manage the CFPB. House Democrats had voted to place the CFPB under the direction of a five-member, bipartisan commission during debate over the Dodd-Frank Act, but later abandoned their support for the commission structure.  HR 1315 creates a meaningful review process for rules promulgated by the CFPB that takes into consideration how a proposed rule could endanger the safety and soundness of consumers’ financial institutions; and also ensures there is a Senate-confirmed chair of the commission before the CFPB exercises its new regulatory authority.
About the author
Published
Jun 22, 2012
In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."

Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Banning NTRAPS

The new law prohibits the recording of NTRAPS in property records, creates penalties if NTRAPS are recorded, and provides for the removal of NTRAPS currently in place.