Skip to main content

New Study Finds Servicer Settlement Funds Being Used for Non-Housing Issues

Oct 22, 2012

Enterprise Community Partners Inc. has released a new study titled "States Fall Short on Help for Housing: Six Months after Mortgage Settlement, Less than Half of States’ $2.5 Billion Has Gone for Housing" showing how the states who were parties to the landmark National Mortgage Settlement have been allocating their designated funds and analyzes whether states have adhered to the intent of the settlement. Announced in February 2012, the historic joint state-federal settlement among 49 state attorneys general, the federal government and the country’s five largest mortgage servicers provides as much as $25 billion in relief to distressed borrowers and states. A total of $2.5 billion in direct payments to the states were supposed to help prevent foreclosures, stabilize communities and prevent or prosecute financial fraud. However, States Fall Short on Help for Housing reveals that less than half of the announced expenditures will be used as intended. “Enterprise’s States Fall Short on Help for Housing report shines a spotlight on the fact that the majority of National Mortgage Settlement funds, particularly in some of the hardest hit states, are not going to help prevent foreclosures, stabilize communities, and prevent or prosecute financial fraud as originally intended,” said Terri Ludwig, president and CEO of Enterprise. Additional key findings of the study include the following: ►States have so far announced plans to spend $966 million for housing and foreclosure-related activities ►$988 million has been diverted to states’ general funds or for non-housing uses ►$588 million remains to be allocated ►While the majority of states plan to use most of their funds for housing-related activities the largest recipients including California, Florida and Texas are not currently doing so ►Six states have deviated completely from the agreed upon uses of the funds, allocating zero percent to housing, including Alabama, California, Georgia, Missouri, New Jersey and South Carolina ►Settlement funds have begun to flow as intended in a number of states including Ohio, Tennessee and Connecticut
About the author
Published
Oct 22, 2012
Mortgage Servicers Added To Junk-Fee Naughty List

New release from CFPB lays out areas of improvement, and concern, for mortgage servicers.

In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."