Robo-Signing Practices Net $1.9 Million for NY State in Settlement – NMP Skip to main content

Robo-Signing Practices Net $1.9 Million for NY State in Settlement

Feb 01, 2013

New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman has announced a multi-state settlement with Lender Processing Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries, LPS Default Solutions and DocX to resolve claims of unlawful foreclosure practices, including robo-signing. The $121 million settlement, reached by New York, 44 other states and the District of Columbia, will require LPS and its subsidiaries to reform their business practices and, if necessary, to correct documents it improperly executed that harmed homeowners. New York’s share of the settlement is approximately $1.9 million. The states on this investigation’s executive committee are Florida, Illinois, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Iowa, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas and Washington. “Lender Processing Services Inc., LPS Default Solutions and DocX cut corners in order to maximize their profits,” said Attorney General Schneiderman. “My office will pursue any company that generates false or robo-signed documents that are used to foreclose on New York homeowners.” The proposed consent judgment resolves allegations that the Jacksonville-based company “robo-signed” documents and engaged in other improper conduct related to mortgage loan default servicing. LPS Default Solutions and DocX primarily provide technological support to banks and mortgage loan servicers. Among other things, the settlement prohibits signature by unauthorized persons or those without first-hand knowledge of the facts attested to in filed documents, enhances oversight of the default services provided, and requires review of all third-party fees to ensure that the fees have been earned and are reasonable and accurate. The settlement also accomplishes the following: ► Prohibits LPS (including DOCX) from engaging in the practice of “surrogate signing” of documents; ► Ensures that LPS has proper authority to sign documents on behalf of a servicer, if in fact it is signing documents; ► Requires LPS to accurately identify the authority that the signer has to execute the document and where that signer is employed; ► Prohibits LPS from notarizing documents outside the presence of a notary and ensures that notarizations will comply with applicable laws; ► Prohibits LPS from improperly interfering with the attorney-client relationship between attorneys and services; ► Prohibits LPS from incentivizing or promoting attorney speed or volume to the detriment of accuracy; ► Requires LPS to ensure that foreclosure and bankruptcy counsel or trustees can communicate directly with the servicer; ► Requires LPS to have enhanced oversight and review of processes over third parties it manages, including those entities that perform property preservation services; ► Prohibits LPS from imposing unreasonable mark-ups or other fees on third party providers’ default or foreclosure-related services; ► Requires LPS to establish and maintain a toll-free phone number for consumers concerning document execution and property preservation services (including winterization, inspection, preservation, and maintenance); and ► Requires LPS to modify mortgage documents that require remediation when LPS has legal authority to do so and when reasonably necessary to assist a consumer or when required by state or local laws. In the settlement, LPS stipulates to important facts uncovered in the investigation, including the practice by DocX of so-called “surrogate signing,” the signing of documents by an unauthorized person in the name of another and notarizing those documents as if they had been signed by the proper person. Once the judgment is entered by the courts, LPS will undertake a review of documents executed during the period of Jan. 1, 2008 to Dec. 31, 2010 to determine what documents, if any, need to be re-executed or corrected. If LPS is authorized to make the corrections, it will do so and will make periodic reports to the Attorney General of the status of its review and/or modification of documents.
About the author
Published
Feb 01, 2013
Jobs Report Comes In Weak After Mortgage Rates Surge

Employers added just 29,000 jobs in September, sending Treasury yields lower and offering a potential counterweight to the recent rise in mortgage rates

Oct 02, 2026
Price Cuts Hit Four-Year High As Mortgage Rates Top 7%

More than one in five listings took a price cut in September, but pending sales still posted their sharpest annual decline since March 2025

Oct 01, 2026
Serious Mortgage Delinquencies Rise 19% After Five Months Of Improvement

ICE data shows 574,000 mortgages were at least 90 days past due in August, while early-stage delinquencies remained below year-ago levels

Sep 29, 2026
Smaller Down Payments Give Buyers More Room, But Rates Limit The Savings

The typical down payment fell 9% from a year ago, while shifting market conditions are giving originators different affordability conversations across the country

Sep 25, 2026
Mortgage Rates Break 7% Just As Builders Find A Way To Move Buyers

New-home sales rose 6.4% in August as builders cut prices, offered incentives, and sold more lower-priced homes. Now mortgage rates are moving against buyers again

Sep 25, 2026
Borrowers Want Digital Closings, But Some Originators Remain Hesitant

ServiceLink finds 45% of surveyed LOs cite borrower reluctance as a barrier, even though most recent buyers say digital options would influence their choice of mortgage provider

Sep 23, 2026