Skip to main content

Trulia: Markets Where Obama Won in 2012 Have Lowest Housing Affordability

Oct 27, 2014

The expression “limousine liberal” might have new degree of resonance based on the 2012 election. According to a study by Trulia that rated the housing affordability levels in the nation’s 100 largest metro markets based on their 2012 presidential vote, markets that brought President Obama back for a second term have the lowest level of affordable housing in the nation.

Trulia Chief Economist Jed Kolko split the nation into three parts: Red markets that voted overwhelmingly for Republican candidate Mitt Romney (a total of 32 metro areas), light-blue markets where President Obama beat Romney by less than 20 percentage points (40 metro areas) and dark-blue markets where the president’s re-election support exceeded 20 points (28 markets).

“When we looked at housing trends in these metros, we found that the housing crisis and recovery affected red and blue markets similarly,” stated Kolko in a blog posting. “But today’s pressing housing issues are more severe in blue markets.”

Kolko noted that while regional housing recovery trends are not betraying any bias to red or blue markets, the situation is significantly different in regard to affordability.

“None of the 10 reddest markets had a median asking price per square foot above $130 in September 2014,” Kolko continued. “But nine of the 10 bluest markets did. Looking across all 100 largest metros, the correlation between price-per-square-foot and 2012 vote margin was positive, high (0.63), and statistically significant. In fact, the only expensive red market was Orange County, Calif., at $363 per square foot. There was a huge drop-off to the next-most-expensive red market—North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, Fla., at $150 per square foot.”

Kolko acknowledged that blue market households tend to have higher income than their red market counterparts, but the share of homes for sale that can be accessed by median-income households is also lower in blue markets.

“Furthermore, blue markets have lower homeownership and greater income inequality than red markets,” he continued. “As with affordability, the relationships between homeownership and inequality on one hand and 2012 voting patterns on the other hand are statistically significant.”

Nonetheless, Kolko stressed that Trulia’s findings should not be seen as the real estate data world’s endorsement of the Republicans.

“The point is not that Democrats cause expensive housing, lower homeownership, or greater inequality,” he insisted. “Determining whether and how the political views of voters or their elected officials affect local housing markets is the stuff of scholarly research, not short blog posts. But because blue markets are less affordable, have lower homeownership, and have greater income inequality, political leaders in Democratic-leaning and Republican-leaning metros may push for different policies.” 

About the author
Published
Oct 27, 2014
Mass Firings At CFPB Imminent, Filing Says

Unions representing CFPB employees said 95% of the Bureau's workforce could be cut by the weekend

Feb 14, 2025
Realty Fees On The Rebound

Real estate commissions are trending back up, post-NAR settlement.

Feb 13, 2025
Wire Fraud Losses Are Mounting

First-time homebuyers are especially at risk for wire fraud, report finds.

Feb 13, 2025
HUD Secretary Halts Equal Access Rule Enforcement

HUD to be transformed 'in His own image'

Feb 10, 2025
Rocket's All-American Return To The Super Bowl

The company spends millions to remind Americans of "the meaning of home."

Feb 10, 2025
Homebuilders Cheer Delay Of Trump Trade War

Canada and Mexico stave off tariffs on billions of dollars of materials crucial to the U.S. homebuilding industry

Feb 04, 2025