The Unique Conduct of Mortgage Closings in California Amid Concerns Over Fraud – NMP Skip to main content

The Unique Conduct of Mortgage Closings in California Amid Concerns Over Fraud

Andrew Liput
Oct 27, 2015
Closing table

According to figures published by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), CoreLogic, Interthinx and LexisNexis, based upon filed SARS reports and other available data, California has been cited in the top 10 fraud states nearly every year. In 2009 and 2010, California was third in the nation for the most mortgage fraud incidents. In 2011 and 2012, California came in seventh out of 50 states. In 2013, the state improved to 10th place, then in 2014, crept back up to second place. California is a large state, with many investment properties, diverse communities and a large and diverse housing stock, which ensures that it will also be a target for mortgage fraud.

California allows several different parties to handle and participate in a property's escrow and closing process. Escrow companies licensed by the state's corporation commission are the primary agents allowed to handle California real estate escrow and closings, however, property title companies frequently handle real estate escrow and closings and attorneys and real estate brokers may also be involved. In some instances California-licensed real estate brokers can handle escrow and real estate closings for their clients.

Who may conduct a closing may also differ geographically. In Northern California, property title companies traditionally handle escrow and closing activities. Southern California real estate processes are different, however, in that escrow companies as well as lenders deal with escrow and closing services. However, California is so large that the selection of escrow and closing services providers can vary even from county to county.

When fraud occurs, the State of California encourages government reporting however the ability to recover for losses when fraud has already taken place is limited. Escrow officers are required have a stated $25,000 net worth and to maintain a $125,000 fidelity bond as well as a $25,000 surety bond. Upon initial application, escrow officers must complete a fingerprint process and a criminal background check. It is performed only once upon licensing; there is no ongoing monitoring or annual checks conducted. In a state where the current average home price is $393,000 (according to Zillow) and the average mortgage is $310,676 (Lending Tree) these protections are helpful, but will not prevent fraud nor cover a significant lender loss.

Attorneys are licensed when admitted to the bar and should be insured, however malpractice insurance is not required in California, it is only recommended. Title agents who are not direct employees of an underwriter must maintain a $25,000 surety bond and are issued closing protection letters however the CPL does not cover all fraud incidents such as conspiracies and theft of NPI.

Of further concern to lenders in California is the perceived lack of a legal duty for closing agents to actually report fraud even if they have actual knowledge that it is taking place. In 1999, in Vournas v. Fidelity National Title Co., the California Court of Appeals held that settlement agents have “no duty to police the affairs of a lender,” and have no obligation to “report fraud.” Similar results were reached in Axley v. Transnational Title Ins. Co. and Lee v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.

CFPB vendor management rules require lenders to adopt policies to evaluate and monitor anyone who handles their documents, funds and borrower NPI for risk, not simple rely upon licenses and insurance. California lenders are quickly adopting new vendor management solutions to evaluate and monitor risk for closing professionals to deter and prevent fraud and the threat of harm before it occurs.

Greater risk management rules and vendor management programs may never knock California out of the list of top fraud states, but they very well may help deter the types of mortgage and settlement fraud risks those lenders and consumers in the state fear most.



Andrew Liput is CEO of Secure Insight, a risk analytics firm offering vendor management services addressing settlement agent risk. He can be reached by e-mail at [email protected].



This article originally appeared in the September 2015 print edition of National Mortgage Professional Magazine. 

Published
Oct 27, 2015
CFPB Alters Threshold For Exempting Loans From Special Appraisal Requirements

The 2022 threshold for exempting loans from special appraisal requirements for higher-priced mortgage loans will increase from $27,200 to $28,500. 

Regulation and Compliance
Dec 02, 2021
Regulatory Review, Reformatted

The progress made to date with NMLS modernization

Regulation and Compliance
Dec 01, 2021
November Surprise: Fed May Accelerate Tapering

Chairman Powell tells Congress of concerns about inflation, COVID-19 variant’s effect on recovery.

Regulation and Compliance
Dec 01, 2021
FHFA's 2022 Conforming Loan Limit Maxes Out At Nearly $1M

Baseline limit for Fannie, Freddie increases to $647,200, but for 'high-cost areas' loan ceiling set at $970,800 for single-family homes.

Regulation and Compliance
Dec 01, 2021
Regulators Are Back In The Saddle

There’s not only a new sherriff in town, it’s a whole gang of them.

Regulation and Compliance
Nov 29, 2021
CFPB Seeks Insight On Creating A Fairer Mortgage Market

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has been actively looking to create a fairer mortgage market, free of discriminatory engagements. To do so, it issued a Request for Information to seek input on rules implementing the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act.

Regulation and Compliance
Nov 17, 2021