Communications to Collect a Debt – NMP Skip to main content

Communications to Collect a Debt

Dec 03, 2015

Question: Recently, we were cited by our regulator for not stopping our communications in our debt collection efforts. Apparently, we violated a regulation that requires us to stop such communications at a certain point. When should we stop communicating with a borrower for debt collection purposes?

Answer
Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), once a debt collector receives written notice from a consumer that either the consumer refuses to pay the debt or that the consumer wishes the debt collector to cease further communication with the consumer, the debt collector must cease communicating with the consumer with respect to such debt. [15 USC § 1692c(c)]

Note that the term “consumer” includes the consumer’s spouse, parent (if the consumer is a minor), guardian, executor, or administrator. [15 USC § 1692c(d)]

Notification is effective upon receipt by the debt collector. Due to the strict liability standard of the FDCPA, the debt collector will generally be liable for any communication sent after the date of receipt, even if the debt collector has no actual knowledge of the request.

Issues will arise under the applicable provision with respect to what constitutes a valid written notice from the consumer, or whether a consumer’s subsequent communication to the debt collector waives the prior request to cease communication. One suggestion is to use the “least sophisticated consumer” standard, as courts have used this standard in interpreting the FDCPA; that is, courts will liberally interpret a notice to be valid and will uphold a consumer’s rights despite communications that appear to waive the request to cease communication.

Also note, issues may arise with respect to multiple debts owed by a consumer. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has weighed in on this subject. According to the FTC, a consumer who requests that communication be ceased with respect to a previous debt, must repeat that request in connection with a subsequent debt being collected by the same debt collector. [Atteberry, FTC Informal Staff Letter, 12/30/77]



Jonathan Foxx is president and managing director of Lenders Compliance Group, Brokers Compliance Group, Servicers Compliance Group and Vendors Compliance Group, national companies devoted to providing regulatory compliance advice and counsel to the mortgage industry. He may be contacted by phone at (516) 442-3456, by e-mail at [email protected] or visit www.LendersComplianceGroup.com.

About the author
Published
Dec 03, 2015
CFPB Weighs Changes To TRID Timing And Mortgage Rescission Rules

The bureau is seeking feedback on whether federal disclosure requirements raise costs, delay closings or limit access to mortgage credit

CFPB Issues AI Underwriting Guidance On Adverse Action Notices

The agency says proprietary and machine-learning models do not relieve lenders of their fair lending and disclosure responsibilities

VantageScore Says 4.0 Model Could Unlock $1 Trillion In Mortgage Originations

New study says VantageScore 4.0 scores five million more creditworthy borrowers than FICO Score 10T, expanding lending opportunities as the industry prepares for the GSE credit score transition

MISMO Updates Mortgage Insurance Standards To Support FICO 10T, VantageScore 4.0

New implementation guide standardizes mortgage insurance data exchange, helping lenders, insurers and technology providers prepare systems for newer credit scoring models

Congress Weighs New Roadmap To End Fannie, Freddie Conservatorship

Rep. Scott Fitzgerald's three-bill housing package would establish a statutory framework for releasing the GSEs while expanding construction lending and easing some TRID compliance requirements

CHLA Backs Bank Capital Proposal, Questions Impact On Mortgage Lending

Trade group supports lower mortgage risk weights but says broader market forces — not capital rules — drove banks' retreat from the market