Skip to main content

Bernanke: Don’t Break Up the Big Banks

Phil Hall
May 16, 2016
In a blog posting ahead of his speech today on a Minneapolis Fed panel, Ben Bernanke has come out vehemently opposed to any effort that would break up the so-called “Too Big to Fail” banks

In a blog posting ahead of his speech today on a Minneapolis Fed panel, Ben Bernanke has come out vehemently opposed to any effort that would break up the so-called “Too Big to Fail” banks.

The former Federal Reserve chairman used his Brookings Institution blog to insist that efforts to slice up super-sized banks would create more harm than good.

“Even putting aside the short-term costs and disruptions that would likely be associated with breaking up the largest banks, in the long run, a U.S. financial industry without large firms would likely be less efficient, providing fewer services at higher cost,” he claimed. “From a national perspective, this strategy could also involve ceding leadership in the industry, and the associated jobs and profits, to other countries. It’s true that economists disagree on the returns to size in banking. There are no doubt diseconomies of scale as well (e.g., ‘Too Big to Manage.’) But uncertainty about the costs and benefits of size can itself be a reason for caution in applying arbitrary size limits, particularly in a world in which firms and business models are heterogeneous.”

Bernanke also stressed that smaller banks can create more harm than good, especially during periods of economic downturn.

“Financial panics can occur in systems dominated by small banks as well as by large ones, as was the case in the United States in the Great Depression,” Bernanke continued. “In contrast, Canada, which has only large banks, did relatively well in both the Depression and in the recent crisis. The basic elements of a financial panic—broad-based loss of confidence in banks, runs by providers of short-term funding, fire sales of bank loans and other assets, disruption of credit flows—can arise even without large banks.”

Bernanke acknowledged the 2008 failure of Lehman Brothers as playing a role in the subsequent recession, but he warned that that the doomed institution was not example of being too big to fail. “Factors other than size, including complexity, opacity, illiquidity, and interconnectedness with other firms, contributed to the catastrophic effects of Lehman’s collapse, as did the fact that the government did not have the legal authorities it needed to manage Lehman’s demise in a more orderly way,” Bernanke insisted.

Published
May 16, 2016
Planet Home Lending Reports Total Origination Volume Of $6.8B In Q2 2021

Planet Home Lending's total origination volume reached $6.8 billion in Q2 2021, up 77% from $3.9 billion in Q2 2020.

Industry News
Jul 22, 2021
FHFA Ends Controversial Refinance Fee

The FHFA announced that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will eliminate the Adverse Market Refinance Fee for loan deliveries, starting August 1, 2021.

Analysis and Data
Jul 19, 2021
Interfirst Mortgage Launches ONE, Backed By Non-Owner Occupied Properties

ONE is a unique product built on a single interest rate with no adjustments and qualifies off the cash flow of the rental property.

Industry News
Jul 16, 2021
Global Digital Lending Market Projected To Reach $27B By 2028

The Global Digital Lending Platform Market was valued at $7.14 billion in 2020 and is projected to reach $27.07 billion by 2028.

Analysis and Data
Jul 14, 2021
FOMC Discusses Raising Interest Rates

Inflationary pressures have finally forced the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to discuss raising interest rates and tapering its bond-buying program.

Analysis and Data
Jul 14, 2021
Fathom Holdings Inc. Creates New Hispanic Division

Fathom Holdings Inc., a technology-driven real estate platform, announced the creation of their Hispanic Division to more adequately serve this fast-growing demographic. 

Industry News
Jul 07, 2021