BB&T Settles False Claims Act Charges for $83M – NMP Skip to main content

BB&T Settles False Claims Act Charges for $83M

Sep 30, 2016
BB&T Corp. will pay $83 million to settle charges that violated the False Claims Act in its handling of Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgages

BB&T Corp. will pay $83 million to settle charges that violated the False Claims Act in its handling of Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgages.

In a statement released by the U.S. Department of Justice, the Winston-Salem, N.C.-based company admitted that it certified for FHA insurance mortgage loans that failed to meet the federal underwriting requirements and did not comply with the FHA’s quality control requirements on these loans. The charges also revealed that BB&T management was aware of this problem through monthly reviews and reports from its quality control department. The settlement covers originations and underwriting conducted between January 1, 2006 and Sept. 30, 2014.

“While profiting from the FHA program, BB&T exposed the taxpayers to losses by failing to comply with HUD guidelines, and then took the additional step of falsely certifying that it had complied with such guidelines,” said U.S. Attorney John Horn of the Northern District of Georgia. “This settlement recovers substantial losses caused by BB&T’s decision to place its own profits above its commitment to adhere to HUD underwriting and quality control requirements.”

BB&T acknowledged the settlement in a press statement that said the inquiry was settled “without any admission of liability to avoid the cost and uncertainty of potential litigation.”

About the author
Published
Sep 30, 2016
Closing Costs: What HUD’s Proposed Rule Will Really Do To The Market

HUD’s proposed rollback of housing protections could deepen barriers for underserved borrowers, shrink the pool of prospective homebuyers, and ultimately cost loan originators business

Aug 27, 2026
MISMO Gives Lenders A New Test For Mortgage AI Vendors

Two certifications move the industry’s FRAME initiative from governance guidance toward product-level validation and implementation

Aug 27, 2026
One Owner, Two GSEs: Would Fannie And Freddie Still Compete?

Oksenholt Capital says shared infrastructure could lower costs without weakening competition, but mortgage bankers have warned that common ownership could reduce lender choice, innovation, and market resilience

Aug 27, 2026
MaxClass: Education Meets Lead Generation

CEO Kelly Hendricks details how MaxClass and HomeQB are opening a new referral channel for originators

Fannie Mae Returns To Distressed-Loan Market With $214 Million Sale

The agency’s first nonperforming-loan offering in 13 months transfers 969 deeply delinquent mortgages to private buyers, including a small pool concentrated in Dallas-Fort Worth

Aug 20, 2026
Brief Refinance Shift Tests Mortgage Lenders’ Compliance Controls

Critical defect rate jumps 23.9% as math-based compliance findings expose the potential for one systemic error to affect loans across a lender’s book