Record Retention: Evidence of Compliance under TILA – NMP Skip to main content

Record Retention: Evidence of Compliance under TILA

Jonathan Foxx
Jul 20, 2017


Question: We are going paperless, but we are unsure about retaining documents under the Truth-in-Lending Act (TILA), since we know that regulatory enforcement requirements may cause us to hold on to evidence. That goes along with our concerns about retaining paper copies, too. You may have answered a question like this one before, but we are still unsure of what evidence we need to retain to show compliance. So, we want to know what is the timeline for retaining documents beyond the required time required in case of regulatory enforcement against us? Also, must we keep paper copies as evidence of compliance?
 
Answer
You have asked a complicated question about regulatory enforcement parameters, with respect to record retention. Because you have framed your question in the context of TILA, this response will be narrowed to Regulation Z, the implementing regulation of TILA.
Except with respect to advertising, creditors must retain evidence of compliance with Regulation Z for a period of two years after the date the disclosures are required to be made or action is required to be taken. Enforcement of TILA, however, may require the creditor to retain records for longer periods necessary to carry out enforcement responsibilities and administrative actions.
 
In effect, this means that administrative agencies responsible for enforcing a subject regulation may require creditors under their jurisdictions to retain records for a longer period, if necessary to perform their enforcement responsibilities. [12 CFR § 226.25(a)]
As to paper retention, in terms of adequate evidence of compliance, actual paper copies of disclosures or other business records are not absolutely necessary to be retained. Evidence may be retained on microfilm, microfiche, computer programs, or by any other method that reproduces records accurately.
 
As a matter of fact, the creditor needs to retain only enough information to reconstruct the required disclosures or other records. By way of example, the creditor does not need to retain each open-end, periodic statement for purposes of complying with record retention of a home-equity plan's periodic statement, as long as the specific information on each statement can be retrieved. In other words, written procedures for compliance with the disclosure requirements and a sample periodic statement represent adequate evidence of compliance. [12 CFR Supplement I to 226, Official Staff Interpretations, § 226.25(a)-2]

Jonathan Foxx is Managing Director of Lenders Compliance Group, the first and only full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the United States, specializing exclusively in outsourced mortgage compliance and offering a suite of services in residential mortgage banking for banks and non-banks. If you would like to contact him, please e-mail [email protected].



 
Published
Jul 20, 2017
Governor Appoints Marty Green To Texas Finance Commission

Green has over 30 years of high-level experience in the legal, banking, and financial services industries.

Regulation and Compliance
Jun 27, 2022
NAHB Chairman Blasts Biden Administration Over Lumber Tariffs

Says refusal to cut tariffs on Canadian lumber turns 'a blind eye to America’s housing affordability crisis .'

Regulation and Compliance
Jun 23, 2022
CFPB Director: Agency Reviewing QM Rules, Other Regulations

In a blog post, Rohit Chopra says the goal is to “more clearly communicate the agency’s expectations.”

Regulation and Compliance
Jun 21, 2022
New GSE Guidelines Challenge Condo/Co-op Lenders

Lenders have a terrible time obtaining up-to-date and accurate info from public data

Regulation and Compliance
Jun 16, 2022
10 Legal Steps Every Small Business Should Take

Stay guarded to limit your liability

Regulation and Compliance
Jun 16, 2022
The Fed Boosts Benchmark Rate By 0.75%

Increase is the largest since November 15, 1994.

Regulation and Compliance
Jun 15, 2022