Supreme Court Refuses Case on CFPB Constitutionality

Jan 14, 2019

The U.S. Supreme Court has appointed Paul Clement to argue in support of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)

The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear a case that challenges the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

According to a report in The Hill, the case was brought by the State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the 60 Plus Association, which initially brought their lawsuit in June 2012. The three plaintiffs asked the high court to review a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit's that challenged the constitutionality of the CFPB’s leadership structure.

“The case raises constitutional issues of major importance regarding the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency that wields massive power over the economic activities of the public and sets a dangerous precedent for unaccountable federal bureaucracy,” Sam Kazman, Competitive Enterprise Institute's General Counsel, said in a statement. “But there are other pending lawsuits that raise these same issues, and we are hopeful the court will have another opportunity to review them.”

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the newest member of the high court, recused himself from the decision because he reviewed the case when he was on the District of Columbia Circuit and dissented from the court’s en banc ruling.

About the author

Phil Hall

Link copied

Published

Jan 14, 2019

Analysis and Data

Mortgage Rates Edge Down To 7.32%, Offering Limited Pipeline Relief

The modest decline trims borrower payments, while year-end forecasts above 7% leave LOs focused on deals already close to working

The first mortgage-rate decline in two months trims about $22 from the monthly payment on a $400,000 loan. For LOs trying to salvage year-end transactions, that creates an opening among borrowers already close to making the numbers work.Freddie Mac reported Thursday that the...

Operations

LO Compensation: What The Split Doesn’t Tell You

NMP’s Ignite summit explored the rules, expenses, and platform differences that shape what originators actually earn

A loan officer willing to earn less to win a borrower can still run into a compensation problem. The sticking point is how that smaller paycheck is determined, who funds it, and whether the arrangement connects compensation to the loan’s terms.That tension drove National Mor...

Feb

Sacramento, CA

More from

Regulation and Compliance

Trump Targets Mortgage Insurance, Refi Costs In Sweeping Housing Order

The executive order calls for automatic mortgage insurance cancellation, expanded title insurance alternatives, and cheaper refinances, potentially changing how lenders and servicers handle borrower costs

Regulation and Compliance

Oct 23, 2026

What The 2026 Election Means For Mortgage Professionals

CHLA’s Scott Olson examines how the next Congress could reshape housing tax breaks, lending costs, and access to homeownership — and where bipartisan deals remain possible

Opinion

Oct 22, 2026

Servicer Takes New York Payment-Fee Fight To Federal Court

Onity Group says the state hasn’t clearly defined how fees for optional expedited payments must relate to the cost of providing the service

Regulation and Compliance

Oct 21, 2026

January’s Condo Reserve Increase Puts Project Budgets In Focus

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s higher allocation requirement gives LOs reason to review association finances now, while California’s new funding duties begin in 2032

Regulation and Compliance

Oct 21, 2026

California Probes Lenders Over Delayed Wildfire Insurance Payouts

State regulators are examining access to rebuilding funds, while CalHFA offers financing tools for eligible disaster survivors

Regulation and Compliance

Oct 20, 2026