California Based Lender Slapped With $150,000 Fine – NMP Skip to main content

California Based Lender Slapped With $150,000 Fine

Aug 21, 2020
California Lender Slapped With Fine
Senior Editor

CFPB adds to series of enforcement actions on deceptive mortgage practices

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has issued a consent order, imposing a $150,000 civil penalty against a California mortgage company for sending false, misleading, and inaccurate mailers to military servicemembers and veterans.
 
Go Direct Lenders is licensed as a mortgage broker or lender in about 11 states. It offers and provides mortgage loans guaranteed by the US Department of Veterans Affairs.  Go Direct’s principal means of advertising VA-guaranteed loans is through direct-mail advertisements sent primarily to military servicemembers and veterans. 
 
The bureau found that Go Direct sent consumers numerous mailers for VA-guaranteed mortgages that contained false, misleading, and inaccurate statements or that lacked required disclosures, in violation of the Consumer Financial Protection Act’s prohibition against deceptive acts and practices, the Mortgage Acts and Practices — Advertising Rule, and Regulation Z. The consent order imposes requirements to prevent future violations.
 
For example, Go Direct advertisements misrepresented the credit terms of the advertised mortgage loan by stating credit terms that the company was not actually prepared to offer to the consumer, including advertising a lower annual percentage rate. Go Direct also made misrepresentations about the applicable fees in connection with the advertised mortgage. 
 
Also, Go Direct advertisements misleadingly described variable-rate loans as “fixed” rate loans, when in fact the rate was adjustable and could increase over time. Go Direct advertisements falsely stated or implied that an appraisal, assets, and income documentation were not required to qualify for certain loans and that consumers with FICO scores as low as 500 would qualify for the advertised rates.
 
The Bureau also found that Go Direct advertisements falsely represented that it had records showing that the value of the consumer’s property had increased over the past year by a specific percentage. Go Direct advertisements created the false impression that it was affiliated with the government by using words, phrases, images, or design characteristics that are associated with the VA or the Internal Revenue Service. Further, Go Direct advertisements failed to properly disclose, when required by Regulation Z, credit terms for the advertised mortgage, such as the consumer’s repayment obligations over the full term of the loan.
 
Today’s action is the third case stemming from a Bureau sweep of investigations of multiple mortgage companies that use deceptive mailers to advertise VA-guaranteed mortgages.  On July 24, 2020, the bureau announced consent orders against Sovereign Lending Group, Inc., and Prime Choice Funding, Inc., both California corporations, for similar violations. 
 
The consent order against Go Direct requires Go Direct to pay a civil penalty of $150,000.  The consent order also imposes injunctive relief to prevent future violations, including requiring Go Direct to bolster its compliance functions by designating an advertising compliance official who must review its mortgage advertisements for compliance with mortgage advertising laws prior to their use; prohibiting misrepresentations similar to those identified by the Bureau; and requiring Go Direct to comply with certain enhanced disclosure requirements to prevent future misrepresentations.
 
About the author
Senior Editor
Keith Griffin is a senior editor at NMP.
Published
Aug 21, 2020
Fannie Changes How Rent From A Former Home Counts

Fannie now prohibits leases for departing residences and permits market-analysis tools instead of Form 1007, creating a key documentation difference from Freddie Mac

ACES Targets Loans Traditional QC Samples May Miss

New population-testing technology applies lender-defined rules across selected origination and servicing records, then directs flagged files to human reviewers

Sep 21, 2026
The Risk Your Credit Score Can't See

Place-based market risk can produce dramatically different default outcomes among borrowers with nearly identical credit profiles

Sep 17, 2026
Trump Taps FHA Insider Matt Jones To Lead Agency

The former MBA policy executive would oversee FHA underwriting, servicing, and credit-score changes that directly affect lenders and borrowers

Regulators Propose Risk-Based Vendor Oversight For Community Lenders

Plan could ease reviews of lower-risk mortgage technology while preserving lender responsibility for vendor failures

FHA Sets Jan. 1 Start For FICO 10T And VantageScore 4.0

Lenders will gain competing modern scoring options, but borrowers may not see both offered everywhere

Sep 11, 2026