Skip to main content

Federal Judge Sets Trial Date For Better Lawsuit Vs. Beeline Loans

David Krechevsky
Apr 20, 2023
gavel in courtroom

Originally filed in October 2020, the lawsuit claims a former employee gave Better's trade secrets to Beeline.

A federal judge in New York last week set a date for a trial to begin in a lawsuit filed nearly three years ago by Better Holdco Inc., the online platform for mortgage origination, against competitor Beeline Loans Inc.

The complaint, filled in October 2020 in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, accuses Beeline Loans of “the brazen, willful and deliberate misappropriation of Better’s confidential information and trade secrets” — including the “secret sauce” of its business model — and states that its “younger and smaller” competitor “intentionally and unlawfully obtained, possesses, and is using” those trade secrets.

According to the lawsuit, Beeline obtained the information from a former Better employee, Jack Abramowitz, “whom Beeline hired in no small part because of his knowledge of, and access to, Better’s confidential and proprietary information.”

Watch The Interest


Better states that it contacted Beeline officials when it learned what Abramowitz had done, but those officials “responded dismissively, claiming ‘Beeline doesn’t give a damn about anything that Better does inside its business.’”

Better then launched an investigation, which it said revealed that “Beeline executives knowingly sought, received, and accepted Better’s proprietary and confidential information from Abramowitz.”

According to Better, the information Abramowitz shared with Beeline included proprietary loan origination volume for 2020; copies of five confidential agreements between Better and its key marketing partners; screenshots and data from Better’s confidential Facebook Ad Manager account; and documents containing Better’s proprietary information that he loaded onto Beeline’s Google Drive.

The lawsuit continues, “Perhaps the most egregious example uncovered by Better’s investigation  is the dissemination of data from Better’s highly confidential, proprietary business model (the “Operating Model Data”) — the product of a six-year undertaking with tens of thousands of entries, and the “secret sauce” to Better’s success.”

It adds that, “With this information, Beeline — or any other competitor into whose hands this information might fall — can engineer a matching business model and strategy, short-circuiting Better’s years of work, trial and error, and millions of dollars spent developing the model.”

Better states in the lawsuit that, “It is beyond dispute, and indeed Abramowitz has admitted under oath, that during his employment at Beeline, he wrongfully used and disseminated Better’s confidential and proprietary information.”

It continues, “A competitor acting in good faith would have told Abramowitz to stop — that he had no right to use or disseminate Better’s confidential and proprietary information, and that it had no desire whatsoever to obtain, spread, or use any non-public information from Better. Beeline, however, did not act in good faith.”

While Abramowitz is blamed for stealing the information and providing it to Beeline, he is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit and he no longer is employed by Beeline.

The lawsuit specifically accuses Beeline of misappropriation of confidential information; misappropriation of trade secrets; tortious interference with contract (relating to a “Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement” with Abromowitz that prohibits, among other things, the unauthorized use or disclosure of Better’s confidential and proprietary information); aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty; and violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

Better is seeking an injunction against Beeline and its employees from possessing or using Better’s confidential information and trade secrets, an order providing for the seizure of Better’s trade secrets from Beeline; both compensatory and punitive damages, and court and attorneys’ fees.

Judge John P. Cronan on April 11 signed a pretrial order setting Jan. 8, 2024, for the start of a trial in the case. The order also set Jan. 4 as the date for a final pretrial conference.

Apr 20, 2023
More from
NLRB Says UWM Employment Contracts Violate Workers' Rights

Complaint filed by former senior underwriter and supported by NLRB headed to hearing in July.

May 24, 2023
Judge Dismisses Guild Lawsuit Accusing CrossCountry Of Poaching

Case was dismissed without prejudice in Seattle but could be refiled in California.

May 23, 2023
MBA, NAHB, NAR Warn Supreme Court Of Chaos If CFPB Ruled Unconstitutional

File amicus brief in support of regulator in case to be heard later this year.

May 17, 2023
Grand View Financial President Guilty In $7M Fraud

Robert Sedlar, formerly of LA-based mortgage company, to be sentenced in July.

May 15, 2023
Former Live Well CFO Avoids Prison

Eric Rohr sentenced to time served, plus supervised release in $200M bond fraud.

May 12, 2023
Ocwen Beats CFPB Lawsuit ... Again

For the second time, a federal judge rules CFPB complaint was precluded by a 2017 settlement.

May 03, 2023