Skip to main content

New mortgage service provider added to Calyx Software Network

National Mortgage Professional
Jan 12, 2009

The dangers of closing fraud still loom large for lendersAndrew L. Liput Esq.mortgage farud, closing, loan origination, HUD-1 "Fraud in loan origination is a serious problem, and has been thrust upon the mortgage industry largely due to the zeal of pursuing profits during the housing boom without facing the risk that large volumes of originations, by untrained loan officers, would attract opportunists who see any chance in any booming market to commit criminal acts in pursuit of unbridled greed." Much has been written over the past year about the impact of poor loan origination and overall risk assessment by lenders, resulting in bad credit decisions and outright mortgage fraud. Despite the Congressional bailout, FBI investigations and industry trade association workshops on best practices, the threat of closing table fraud is still being overlooked. The failure to look at the back-end of the mortgage loan process is occurring to the detriment of lenders and threatens to derail the many advances made in fraud prevention and detection to date. Fraud in loan origination is a serious problem, and has been thrust upon the mortgage industry largely due to the zeal of pursuing profits during the housing boom without facing the risk that large volumes of originations, by untrained loan officers, would attract opportunists who see any chance in any booming market to commit criminal acts in pursuit of unbridled greed. Now that fraud in originations is down, thanks mainly to self-policing, increased training and automated fraud detection software, closing table fraud remains a glaring problem yet to be seriously addressed. Closing table fraud involves many of the same elements as mortgage fraud at the origination stage, except that those who conspire tend to be off of a lender's radar screen. Real estate agents, sellers (including builders) and closing agents have little contact in loan origination, since they do not participate in the loan application process. However, they play an enormous role in real estate transactions that are the basis for purchasing money mortgage loan transactions. Improper and illegal collaboration among borrowers, sellers, real estate agents and closing agents creates as equally a dangerous and costly scenario as any other fraud scheme. Yet, even in todays heightened risk averse climate, does a lender know enough about the seller, the real estate agent and most importantly, the closing agent? Everyday, lenders nationwide wire hundreds of millions of dollars into the accounts of men, women and settlement companies about whom they know very little. While they wait anxiously for their signed closing packages to return, their money lies exposed "on the street," without guarantees of security. Why lenders (and title underwriters, for that matter) place universal confidence in the existing loan closing process is a mystery, and a recipe for disaster. Who are these closing agents? Are they experienced? Licensed? Insured? Do we care? Should we care? Of course we should! Lenders that rely solely on closing protection letters, in those states where they are issued, ignore the common practice for agents of title underwriters to issue them without any criteria, and for closing agents to recycle them on their own. It is not unheard of for closing agents to simply "white out" the specific transaction details on a protection letter and use them over and over again. Fannie Maes guidelines to banks on "Preventing, Detecting & Reporting Mortgage Fraud" states, in part, that mortgage lenders must Know [their] business partners & and consider using outside sources to & selectively choose closing attorneys and settlement agents." That was issued back in 2005, yet few, if any, lenders are following this sound advice. While there is no foolproof method of preventing fraud (since the fraudsters tend to frequently change their tactics and methods, and since anyone who is determined to defraud a lender and has the cooperation of enough of the parties to a transaction usually can accomplish it), lenders can arm themselves with more data about the closing process and demand that closing agents meet certain minimum levels of experience, insurance and overall reliability. Shining a light on the closing process, and those who work it, can go a long way toward weeding out the bad operators and defining a better process for the honest and orderly distribution of mortgage loan funds. Furthermore, having access to real-time data about the parties at the closing table, immediate access to key closing documents, as well as the ability to access detailed reports about a closing when audits or loss mitigation efforts are required is highly desirable in todays fraud-infested environment. The answer: Closing table data and fraud deterrence is available. There are online solutions that combine closing table data collection, warehousing, and reporting functions with closing agent registration and transaction recording features that help close the gap between front-end fraud protection and the back end still vulnerable to fraud. There are also third-party closing agent verification services to quickly verify the credentials of the professional to whom lenders are wiring their closing funds. The third-party verification companies charge the closing agent, or the fee to verify credentials is charged as a closing fee on the HUD-1. In both cases, the service is provided without charge to the lender. With the financial industry in shambles, due to risky business practices, there is no room for error when it comes to covering all the bases in the fight against fraud. Now is the time to incorporate the practices and procedures necessary to eliminate this type of fraud when the next housing boom occurs. Every real estate agent, seller, closing agent and lender will only flourish under this protection, with minimal worry. Andrew L. Liput Esq. is president of The Liput Group, and president and managing attorney with Professional Assurance Ltd. He may be reached at (888) 424-3728, through www.professionalassure.com or e-mail [email protected]
Published
Jan 12, 2009
More from
Tech
E-Closing Technology: Norcom Mortgage’s Implementation Lessons

Norcom Mortgage outlines its implementation lessons learned as the company transitioned to its digital experience.

Tech
Sep 17, 2021
New York Community Bank Creates Groundbreaking Digital Payment Process

Now Figure Technologies Inc. can conduct real-time secondary trading in digital shares of its stock by utilizing Figure’s alternative trading system (ATS) that operates on Provenance Blockchain.

Tech
Sep 14, 2021
NAMB Partners With Dell Technologies

Offers Discounts To Members To Help With Technology Upgrades

Tech
Sep 13, 2021
Notarize And Snapdocs Announce Partnership

Notarize and Snapdocs, Inc. entered a partnership in which brings two digital closing companies together in hopes to further streamline the closing process.

Tech
Sep 09, 2021
Hold The Phone: Agile Formally Launches Platform For TBA MBS Quotes

Trade Auction Manager Allows Small to Mid-Size Broker Dealers To Quote Digitally

Tech
Sep 09, 2021
SimpleNexus Approved As eClosing Solution Provider For Both GSEs

SimpleNexus, a homeownership platform developer, is now a Fannie Mae- and Freddie Mac-reviewed eClosing solution provider.

Tech
Sep 07, 2021